Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1998 Memo Cited Suspected Hijack Plot by Bin Laden [CLINTON FAILURE FLASHBACK!!]
Washington Post ^ | Sunday, July 18, 2004 | Susan Schmidt

Posted on 09/27/2006 11:49:52 AM PDT by Enchante

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: threeleftsmakearight

...or when he shakes that finger...


41 posted on 09/27/2006 12:24:29 PM PDT by old and cranky (You! Out Of The Gene Pool - Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: avacado
No response from Clinton

Clinton might have been a better President, if he didn't need to worry about Hillary's career.

He was too fixated on the future....
He was obsessing about avoiding controversy, so that Hillary could be elected the first female President.

I think Hillary's plans to be president handicapped Clinton.
We should never elect a president who is married to someone who wants to be president in the future.
There is too great a risk that the President will act out of loyalty to his spouse's ambitions, rather than act out of loyalty to his fellow countrymen.

42 posted on 09/27/2006 12:28:21 PM PDT by syriacus (Clinton governed by polls in order to protect Hillary's chances to be President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
The 1998 PDB is titled: "Bin Laden preparing to hijack U.S. aircraft and other attacks."

Now fast forward to Hillary a few days ago:

"I'm certain that if my husband and his national security team had been shown a classified report entitled `Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside United States,' he would have taken it more seriously than history suggests it was taken by our current president and his national security team," Hillary Clinton said. She was referring to a briefing Bush got a month before Sept. 11.

OOPS, I guess Clinton WAS shown a daily briefing just about like that.

43 posted on 09/27/2006 12:28:25 PM PDT by IntelliQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

We absolutely do .... will anyone put this stuff out there and push it? I swear they come here and use our research anyway.


44 posted on 09/27/2006 12:29:42 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

BTTT


45 posted on 09/27/2006 12:31:33 PM PDT by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: threeleftsmakearight

"But the 9/11 commission's executive director (I'm sure a Dem) did say the Clinton administration did have an "energetic response" to the threat."

I guess oral sex must be the "energetic response" they speak of?!

LLS


46 posted on 09/27/2006 12:33:01 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IntelliQuark

Yup, the Clintonistas had ample warnings and did squat. Then they turned the 9/11 Omission-Commission into a bad joke with partisan hacks like Ben Veniste and Gorelick controlling the process and output. It's amazing that any real info got through at all....


47 posted on 09/27/2006 12:33:58 PM PDT by Enchante (There are 3 kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies, and the Drive-By Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: IntelliQuark

I have been posting this for two days, and NOT one response! Freepers need to OPEN THEIR EYES!!!

LLS


48 posted on 09/27/2006 12:41:59 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: All

Where's Dick Clarke to answer the questions whether or not there was a plan handed to President Bush? There is a tape of him saying there wasn't one, but then the Libs have a document in his name. They say the document was delivered 5 days after the start of the President term. Any one have an answer? Are the Libs handing out another false document?


49 posted on 09/27/2006 12:45:07 PM PDT by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/clintlon.htm
(snip)
But senior military officers said much more could have been done. Gen Henry Shelton, who recently retired as chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, was adamantly opposed to Mr Clinton's preferred option of sending in Delta Force, which he considered naive.

"Absolutely nothing prevented us from running the kind of operation we're running now, if there had been a commitment to do that," he said.

Although Mr Clinton accepted that the Taliban regime was inextricably linked to bin Laden's al-Qa'eda network, he refused to consider any military action against it. Envoys were twice despatched to Afghanistan to deliver warnings to the Taliban.

The Clinton administration believed that these would be interpreted as ultimatums similar to that subsequently outlined by President Bush before Congress on Sept 20.

However, Mr Clinton's national security team was reluctant to move beyond rhetoric. "There were verbal scoldings but that was about it," said Gen Shelton. "When discussions came up of what are we going to do, the military focus stayed on Osama bin Laden himself and his outfit."

Mr Clinton authorised the assassination of the al-Qa'eda leader and his lieutenants but would not agree to any operation that could have killed women and children around bin Laden.


50 posted on 09/27/2006 1:04:27 PM PDT by Mo1 (Hey McCain and Graham .... our soldiers signed up to dodge bullets not lawsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Is there a time limit on how long she'll get SS protection?


51 posted on 09/27/2006 1:04:35 PM PDT by AmeriBrit (By a miracle we lived through 'Eight Clinton Years of Living Hell'....NO MORE CLINTON'S...EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AmeriBrit

Nope. They are the last two to have it until the end of time. Even Chelsea.


52 posted on 09/27/2006 1:12:15 PM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

wasn't it Clinton that signed an EO about ending the SS ??


53 posted on 09/27/2006 1:14:13 PM PDT by Mo1 (Hey McCain and Graham .... our soldiers signed up to dodge bullets not lawsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Hugh Shelton said that? I am shocked.......and I am not kidding.

I thought he was pro-Clinton -- and so does everybody here in NC: at one NC State basketball game he was introduced and roundly booed!


54 posted on 09/27/2006 1:14:25 PM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer; STARWISE; kcvl; Miss Marple

I've been posting the same damn thing! (Whine) Nobody's listening to us, dang it!


55 posted on 09/27/2006 1:15:42 PM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

What's wrong with this picture?

Chelsea Clinton gets SS protection for life.

President George W. Bush get SS protection for 10 years only.


56 posted on 09/27/2006 1:18:46 PM PDT by AmeriBrit (By a miracle we lived through 'Eight Clinton Years of Living Hell'....NO MORE CLINTON'S...EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"I thought he was pro-Clinton "

IIRC .. he was an advisor for Kerry during the 2004 election


I found this to .. it's been a while since I've looked through my bookmarks


ON CLINTON'S WATCH: Feds Nixed Deal for Plane Plot Tipoff

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1465752/posts


57 posted on 09/27/2006 1:18:58 PM PDT by Mo1 (Hey McCain and Graham .... our soldiers signed up to dodge bullets not lawsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I feel like a metric bolt in a bin of standard nuts. ;-)

LLS


58 posted on 09/27/2006 1:20:40 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Read both PDBs and it's clear the August 2001 one was mainly a summary of the earlier 1998 PDB (there is no record that the outgoing Clinton WH briefed the incoming Bush people about it, and this PDB is the first time they were apprised of some or most of the intelligence). Of course we should all remember the existance of the classified August 2001 PDB was leaked in the spring of 2002 for one aim only, and it was not to share real information but to get the "Bush Knew" idea rolling.

Link to August 2001 PDB:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A2285-2004Apr10?language=printer


59 posted on 09/27/2006 1:23:19 PM PDT by Della Street
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: AmeriBrit
Is there a time limit on how long she'll get SS protection?

Indefinite. However, there is now a law that makes future SS protection for Presidents and family to last 10 years. This law does not effect Hillary.

60 posted on 09/27/2006 1:29:22 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson