To: Moral Hazard
I might vote for a Mormon who hadn't done a mission, but I don't think I could ever vote for one who had.
So you would vote for a "bad" Mormon but not a "good" one?
25 posted on
09/27/2006 11:23:53 AM PDT by
msnimje
(Seriously, if it REALLY were a religion of PEACE, would they have to label it as such?)
To: msnimje
"So you would vote for a "bad" Mormon but not a "good" one?"
If the distinction is whether they did a mission, then yes.
40 posted on
09/27/2006 11:29:27 AM PDT by
Moral Hazard
("That's why I vetoed the 'Johny can't read so let's get Johny laid' bill" - Mr. President)
To: msnimje
"So you would vote for a "bad" Mormon but not a "good" one?"
Clearing my throat now -- you do realize you called Mormons who didn't serve missions BAD and Mormons who did GOOD. That's as twisted and offensive as judging a Mormon not worthy of a vote because he/she served a mission.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson