I only point out spelling errors when I am being called ignorant of something.
The statement "Evolution is anti-religion" we have to look closer at the term "Evolution."
I have said nothing about that statement - my position applies to this statement: "Evolution is not anti-religion" which was used as proof Wells is lying. Read the thread.
The statement "Evolution is anti-religion" we have to look closer at the term "Evolution." Your interpretation seems to be "At least one person in the Evolution community."
Nope - wrong again - I said nothing about the statement "evolution is anti-religion"
That is a rather odd and somewhat disengenuous interpretation. As I pointed out, this means that virtually ALL professions are anti-religion, since virtually all professions (short of the non-laity in religious organizations) will probably meet your "1 person" rule.
Non Sequitur - since I am not supporting in any way the statement "evolution is anti-religion"
The same issue applies. What do you mean by the word "Evolution?" Changing the meaning from "Evolution: the Theory" to "Evolution: The Community" is just as disengenuous as the "1 person standard."
You are still playing word games. Talk about spin.