[RobRoy]

From the article itself:

"The issue here is not "evolution" – a broad term that can mean simply change within existing species (which no one doubts). The issue is Darwinism – which claims that all living things are descended from a common ancestor, modified by natural selection acting on random genetic mutations."

I am really trying to stay on topic here. I stand by my earlier response.

[freedumb2003]

"The issue here is not "evolution" – a broad term that can mean simply change within existing species (which no one doubts). The issue is Darwinism – which claims that all living things are descended from a common ancestor, modified by natural selection acting on random genetic mutations."

Which is why the first tendency is to abandon the thread.

The statement is disengenuous and specious. And, for the most part, wrong.