A fair statement, but Wells is an educated polemicist. His intention to defame evolution is undeniable, and he cannot be so ignorant as not to know that evolution is one of many scientific findings that contradict literal readings of the Bible. Therefore, he knows that evolution can only be anti-religious in the same sense that all of science is anti-religious.
Because all of science ignores religion and the Bible, and every branch of science has findings that contradict a literal reading of the Bible.
His intentions are irrelevant to the validity of his positions. Like I said - why don't you take on his positions rather than attack him personally?
Overstatement placemarker.