Please look up the word "lie"
Unless you can prove the person who said that knew it was not true - all you are doing is presenting your personal opinion not based on any facts (none that you have presented). You, like Democrat Moonbats, seem to not understand the meaning of the word "lie" - as in "Bush lied about WMD in Iraq"
I am asserting it is a lie to say that evolution is anti-religious.
I think there is some evidence that much of what is called "evolution" is in deed anti-religious - but far from all of it. You are going to have a heck of a time disproving somebodies opinion.
If data related to the statement does not support the statement - the statement is NOT considered a lie.
If you think it is a lie - prove that no supporters of evolution are anti-religious. You know that is absurd.
A fair statement, but Wells is an educated polemicist. His intention to defame evolution is undeniable, and he cannot be so ignorant as not to know that evolution is one of many scientific findings that contradict literal readings of the Bible. Therefore, he knows that evolution can only be anti-religious in the same sense that all of science is anti-religious.
Because all of science ignores religion and the Bible, and every branch of science has findings that contradict a literal reading of the Bible.