[Dimensio]

I never, in any posting, claimed that Darwin's Theory is "doomed."

You are correct. I had mistakenly misatttributed someone else's declaration that the theory is "doomed" to you. This does not, however, alter the fact that you attributed elements to the theory that are not actually a part of the theory, which does call into question your credibility when speaking on the theory.

Which calls into question your ability to discern fact from delusion.

My statement was a mistake, not a delusion. Your insults do not lend credibility to your claims.

Get a brain, then get a manual which explains how to use it properly... n'kay?

Insulting me not only does not demonstrate that your claims are factual, but they are also a violation of the terms of usage for this forum.

[Gargantua]

"My statement was a mistake..."

Your admission, while candid, does not lend credibility to your assertions. Moreover, your repeated linguistic malaprop and tortured grammar, when viewed alongside your admitted conceptual error, paint you more as an opinionated poseur rather than an informed academic.

I'll reserve the balance of my time, leaving you the hollow pleasure of pretending to debate the dullards who are sucked in by your pointless, palsied, and errant pseudo-intellectual one-upsmanship.

Remember, nothing less than SPF 80. Don't leave Earth without it.

;-/