I know of books used at Harvaard and Stanford that were written by well educated men who condone homosexuality as an acceptable way of bringing up children with knowledge of. Does that make it right? There are plenty of books on the Civil War that totally disagree with this person's opinion on it, and you consider them to be invalid. You are opinion driven, not fact. You hold up that book because it's the one you have that stands up to your perception of the events. Most do not see it that way. I'm sorry.