Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A CA Guy

I'd love to see the following fair and balanced interview. Clinton comes back for a rematch with Chris Wallace, but with new ground rules. President Bush has to be included in the interview and, as Clinton requested, the same questions have to be asked of Bush as of Clinton.

Wallace (to Clinton): Why didn't you take Osama Bin Laden when you were offered him several times?

Wallace (to Bush): Why didn't Clinton take Osama Bin Laden when he was offered him several times?


12 posted on 09/26/2006 11:55:32 PM PDT by AZLiberty (Teddy drank, people sank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: AZLiberty
Clever and true.

I think the libs are saying something about some note saying Osama was going to attack.

Problem with that was being Clinton let him go, nobody knew where he was, or any idea of how, when, where or when the attack was going to hit.

Easy to say Osama was going to strike, but even if you said planes. When, where, which of the 14,000 always flying around were targeted?

You have to be void of all common sense, fairness or reality to be a true believer lib IMO today.
13 posted on 09/27/2006 12:00:34 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson