Skip to comments.Experts See Lower Threat From al-Qaida ~ (So we must be doing good in Iraq....RIGHT?)
Posted on 09/24/2006 9:18:47 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
CAIRO, Egypt (AP) -
The threats came in a blizzard around the anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks - a series of videos from al-Qaida's No. 2 warning of more strikes to come.
But U.S. intelligence agencies and many private security analysts doubt al-Qaida or its elusive leader, Osama bin Laden, still maintain much if any operational control over far-flung terror cells.
They see no sign of a direct al-Qaida hand in a flurry of recent attacks, such as the assault on the U.S. Embassy in Damascus, Syria, or the fatal shooting of a British tourist in Jordan. The French intelligence report that bin Laden may have died last month of typhoid merely highlights the uncertainty the West now has about any role he plays in the terror network.
All that means those frightening videos may have been just that - designed to frighten the West and inspire followers - with little real punch behind them.
Bin Laden and his top deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, are now "less like generals and more like talking heads, disseminating their violent ideology via satellite television in hopes of inspiring others to do their bidding," said Eben Kaplan of the Council on Foreign Relations think tank in New York.
Not everyone agrees. There are ominous signs in Afghanistan that al-Qaida is trying to make an operational comeback as attacks, especially suicide missions, against U.S. and coalition forces increase.
Some experts also fear the absence of a major, Sept. 11-style attack simply means al-Qaida is taking its time to plan a next spectacular strike.
Still, five years after the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, many analysts believe the day-to-day threat from al-Qaida itself has dropped.
Paradoxically, however, the threat from Islamic extremists may have grown - and become broader, more diverse and more complex, and thus harder to combat.
"The absence of a formal, single organizational structure has contributed to making the fight against this brand of terrorism more elusive and difficult," the British think tank Chatham House said in a report this month as the videos were airing.
That view is also expressed in a classified U.S. intelligence report that says the Iraq war has increased the threat of terrorism by stirring up Islamic extremism around the globe. The report, which represented the consensus of 16 U.S. spy services, was completed in April and first reported in Sunday's New York Times and Washington Post.
After the U.S. and its allies ousted the Taliban in 2001, al-Qaida apparently transformed itself into an ideological movement of self-sustaining cells that operate with little or no central direction, many analysts and intelligence officials believe. That makes them difficult to track - until they strike or make a mistake that leads the authorities to them.
It also makes it difficult to determine whether any specific attack was actually directed by al-Qaida.
For example, British authorities insist there is no evidence al-Qaida directed the July 2005 suicide attacks on the London transit system that killed 52 commuters.
Nonetheless, one of the four British Muslim bombers appeared later on a videotape made before his death, declaring his allegiance to bin Laden. That tape bore the logo of al-Qaida's production company.
"Al-Qaida is crippled and is certainly not the organization it was. Al-Qaida, however, has placed extra emphasis on inspiring other groups and trying to mobilize other groups," the State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, Henry Crumpton, told the Council on Foreign Relations recently.
Al-Qaida's efforts to inspire appear to be focused on a worldwide wellspring of young, radicalized Muslims who share broad anger at the West, especially the United States.
But the goals, methods and targets of those far-flung radicals now vary widely. And not all extremist groups share al-Qaida's vision of global struggle against the West, preferring in some cases to fight instead for specific national political aims.
Across the world, that means the threat is fractured into many parts - with the need to tailor defenses accordingly.
In Britain, mostly homegrown militants of Pakistani descent seem intent on staging the kind of big, spectacular attack that bin Laden used on Sept. 11.
Their efforts have focused again and again on jetliners - as during this summer's scare - and other big transportation systems such as subways.
Elsewhere, however, militants have diverged sharply from bin Laden. The assault this month on the U.S. Embassy in Damascus, Syria - which came just a day after al-Zawahri's warning tapes were aired - serves as a prime example.
In Syria, militants have focused on getting rid of President Bashar Assad and there is no sign they receive any operational direction from al-Qaida.
In Iraq, the fight has mostly morphed into a sectarian conflict between Sunnis and Shiites for control of Iraq's future, although some foreign fighters inspired by al-Qaida seem to still be involved.
Meanwhile, militants from Hamas and Hezbollah share the same hatred of the U.S. and Israel - but have sharply different ideologies and goals than al-Qaida.
Hamas is focused on gaining power among the Palestinian community at the expense of its rival Fatah. Hezbollah wants to carve a role for itself as the leader of Shiite Muslims in Lebanon and the dominant political force in that country.
In places like Sudan and Somalia, Muslim militants are fighting for local power and control. They may have links to bin Laden from the past - but their only real connection seems to be when they invoke his name to resist the West.
Associated Press writer Katherine Shrader in Washington contributed to this report.
So we have done serious damage to Al Queda....but the Terror threat has grown ....but is fractured....they are moving the goal posts again.....
Moving the goal posts? Not really. It's not just about Al Qaeda. Unfortunately, the dunderheads in positions of influence in Western governments around the world refuse to see this.
What do you mean...."of course"?
Glad I ask...I thought you were referring to the ..."they are moving the goal posts again....."
Hmmm, I thought the NIE said Iraq was making terrorism worse. I guess another CIA smear against the president is quickly coming to naught.
So, does this mean that the 'American Hiroshima' has been called off or cancelled?
The Sunni insurgency has also mellowed down considerably.
The Shiite militias are the main troublemakers now and while the media won't talk much about it, those militias are also running into problems, courtesy of the USA and the Iraqi forces.
Yep, that was fast!
Beats me,....there is so much SPIN going on...it is getting hard to keep it straight!
First that I have heard about that....papers here say they just keep finding bodies....
Of course that's all they talk about. And they are still finding bodies and there is still violence in Baghdad. However, the security situation has much improved there just in the last couple of weeks and will continue doing so.
The media doesn't like to talk about things like that. I know the CNN, et al scumbags in the Palestine Hotel know about the successes in Operation Together Forward. They just refuse to pass that particular part on.
See link at #19...NY Times will not like this AP Story....the White House will!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.