Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Australia, the Beacon of Sanity
The American Thinker ^ | 9/23/2006 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 09/24/2006 2:42:54 PM PDT by Dark Skies

Australia is once again making more sense than any other country on earth with regard to issues of culture and immigration. Like its Anglosphere cousins the United States and Canada, Australia’s political economy, personal freedom, rule of law, and other characteristics inherited from the British, make it an extremely attractive place for immigrants. A continental land mass able to accommodate a greater population completes the package luring many, including many Muslims, to dream of a better life there than in their own home countries.

But unlike Canada, which has embraced a self-effacing attitude toward its own cultures, and the United States, which also pays obeisance to the pernicious self-abnegating doctrines of multiculturalism, Australia is unafraid to stand up and say that those wanting to come to Australia must adapt to the existing realities, not expect to change Australia into their home country, only with better weather and welfare benefits.

The BBC reports:

Australia is planning a radical strengthening of immigration laws that would require prospective citizens to take tough English language tests as well as a quiz on history and culture.

Critics have said the plans are patronising and insulting.

Actually, the critics have it backwards. It is quite insulting and patronizing to immigrate to a country and expect it to adapt to the very things one left behind. This is the behavior of a conqueror, not an immigrant.

By definition, an immigrant asks for the privilege of being allowed to live in a country not his or her own. Immigrants have no right to demand change. No more than I have a right to barge into your house and demand you rearrange the furniture, knock out the wall between the kitchen and family room, and paint the parlor walls a different color.

An immigrant stipulates that the country to which he or she goes has a superior system. Without such an attraction, why else leave behind family, friends, and the attachments of sentiment?

Lacking any thoughtful points, the opponents of testing in Australia resort to the cry of racism. Pardon me, but if race were the issue, certain races would not be allowed in. That, in fact, was characteristic of Australian immigration policies in an earlier era. But that is no longer the issue.

The BBC also reports that employers supposedly are worried that the new barriers will keep necessary workers from coming to Australia. That, too, is utter nonsense. Workers unwilling to adapt to local language and culture are not likely to be very good employees, willing to learn new skills, able to deal with fellow workers or customers.

The honest truth is that the Anglosphere has a superior political economy, and that is why the world wants to emigrate to our lands. Leftist multiculturalists, angry at their homelands and haunted by their own demons, have a need to believe that there is something wrong at home. Thus the insane mental construct that any change will be an improvement, even changes proposed by Sharia-embracing migrants.

As Prime Minister Howard said recently, those who want to live under Sharia have quite a number of countries in which to live. There is no reason for Australia (or Canada or America or Britain or France, for that matter) to accommodate them. Other than their own confusion, self-loathing, and moral weakness of their elites, riven with self-soubt and cravenly seeking approval from the cosmopolitan smart set.

My admiration for Prime Minister Howard continues to grow. My love for Australia and Australians, always deep, has turned into utter infatuation. If I couldn’t live in my beloved America, I would be off to Australia in a heartbeat.

Where, oh where, are the poltiical leaders of America? Don’t they understand that anyone with the guts to follow the lead of PM Howard would become an instant hero?

Evidently, they are too cowed by fear of being called racist to embrace the common sense doctrine that those who seek to enter our culture deserve to have it remain intact for them and their children.

Hat tip: Joseph Crowley

Thomas Lifson is the editor and publisher of American Thinker.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: australia; hedaman; howard; immigration; islam; muslim; oz; sharia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Dark Skies

I tell my Australian friends that I consider them to be our first and best cousins.

They're a fun-loving bunch too!


41 posted on 09/24/2006 6:48:04 PM PDT by poindexters brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller
Why do all the elites want to have villas in the south of France rather than Tasmania?... You know there is a lot of warm ocean to swim in around Australia.

As my Australian friends told me:

"Everything in Australia bites - and it's poisonous."

An exageration to be sure, but actually not that far off!

As far as swimming in the ocean, witness the Blue-ringed octupus:

http://www.didyouknow.cd/animals/octopus.htm

42 posted on 09/24/2006 6:55:51 PM PDT by poindexters brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: poindexters brother

It never ceases to amaze how people swallow the line that everything bites in Australia. Perhaps, they have swallowed too many Aussie tall stories.


43 posted on 09/24/2006 10:35:13 PM PDT by Fair Go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81; Earthdweller

Watch out! Tasmania is Australia's version of Vermont or Washington at least. It is equally on a down spiral economically and socially.


44 posted on 09/24/2006 11:20:01 PM PDT by NZerFromHK (The US Founding is what makes Britain and USA separated by much more than a common language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NZerFromHK

Not quite!


45 posted on 09/25/2006 1:05:33 AM PDT by Fair Go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Fair Go

At least many Kiwis say it is more like New Zealand than anywhere in Australia. And NZ is like the US New England by a long shot.


46 posted on 09/25/2006 1:10:35 AM PDT by NZerFromHK (The US Founding is what makes Britain and USA separated by much more than a common language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: siznartuf

That puts it perfectly---brilliant, the way he nails the behavior, and the arrogance of the assumptions behind it:
"the behavior of a conqueror, not an immigrant".
all over the world, wherever they migrate, the Muslims think they have already conquered the lands they have been allowed to gain a foothold in, and their positively unbearable impatience seems to suggest that their host countries don't quite recognize yet that they have been "conquered". These are the most twisted and dysfunctional people on earth, and it dawned on me sometime in late 2001 that Islam would become the blight of the 21st Century.


47 posted on 09/25/2006 1:16:42 AM PDT by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NZerFromHK

Until a couple of years ago, homosexual acts were illegal in Tasmania. While the green movement is very active there, I don't think it is particulary socially radical. Remember, Richard Butler proved a little too radical for Tasmania during his brief sojourn as governor.


48 posted on 09/25/2006 1:35:17 AM PDT by Fair Go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Australian lefties(US liberals) are in control of Govt at every state in the country and only few steps away from control of the federal Govt. Australian lefties are equally and if not more virulent that the US democrats. They have been denied in Federal elections simply because of the expert campaigning and political skills of PM John Howard who fights a battle against the Aussie MSM and who is admired by many in the country. There is no clear succession for Howard and who has the skills to win elections, Costello is considered a joke and a wimp in political circles. Amidst all this praise, it has to be realised that the country is not that far off from slipping in to another canada.


49 posted on 09/25/2006 1:55:22 AM PDT by GregH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

What hoops do you have to go through to apply for Australian citizenship?


50 posted on 09/25/2006 3:27:56 AM PDT by quesney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

"""Also, American culture is more than simply descendant of British culture. It would be logical if Canadians and Australians were also offended by such a statement, as though they have not progressed since they were colonized"""


Why should they be offended? They aren't descendents of German or Italian or Jewish culture. Australia is almost a carbon copy of Britain. There isn't too much seperating the people's of both countries. Hell, they even play the same sports.

'Progressed since colonisation'? You saying British culture is in the dark ages and it's a bad thing if you don't 'progress' from it?

What a muppet. Sheesh.


51 posted on 09/25/2006 3:38:17 AM PDT by kopite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
Yeah, Muslims take themselves too seriously. I swear, there must be some way to breed a "kindler, gentler" version of these critters.

Maybe if people in western countries start producing little Raggedy Ann-style "Allah" dolls for the little muzzletts to play with...

52 posted on 09/25/2006 6:32:58 AM PDT by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fair Go; NZerFromHK
I don't think it is particulary socially radical

Well, Helen did abolish the Air Force. That's a bit radical to say the least. Sounds like something Massachusetts would do.

53 posted on 09/25/2006 3:35:47 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

I meant Tasmania. Abolishing the air force is a bit radical to say the least.


54 posted on 09/25/2006 4:00:40 PM PDT by Fair Go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: supremedoctrine

... "and it dawned on me sometime in late 2001 that Islam would become the blight of the 21st Century."

I had a similar epiphany about a year before the 9/11 attack.

I didn't realize until after the attack how prescient I had earlier been.


55 posted on 09/25/2006 6:44:19 PM PDT by siznartuf (If I Hear "Jobs Americans Won't Do" One More ^%&^%^%# Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: siznartuf

I lied---I had the premonition TWO years before 9-11, no three years, no...... I get your point. But seriously,
five years later, and they ARE the blight so far, with no end in sight, and it really does look like it could go on nearly indefinitely, or unless someone cracks on one side or the other.


56 posted on 09/25/2006 7:12:18 PM PDT by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Ping (for when I have time)


57 posted on 09/25/2006 9:01:54 PM PDT by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson