Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A CA Guy

And......it's a moot point now, but Perot could have won that election if he hadn't started "Doing the Hokey-Pokey".


157 posted on 09/24/2006 10:51:22 PM PDT by Just Lori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: Spanaway Lori

Perot never could have won anything.

He was a spitefully bastard who had a thing against Bush from the past.

The people were at that time all over Bush 1 for a recession that was actually caused by a bill from Jimmy Carter in 1980 that caused the S&L crisis.

Instead of going to the root and blaming the cause, the man who was in office.

Perot was on a personal vendetta against Bush1 and like all third party voting in a main election, might as well tattoo Democrat on your butt when you vote that way IMO.


160 posted on 09/24/2006 10:59:17 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson