Posted on 09/24/2006 9:03:18 AM PDT by technomage
You can never go wrong claiming that clinton is a liar.
You are correct, and his talent for aggressive rapid fire speech, aimed mostly at supporters, has used this diversion-from-reality technique for his entire presidency. The sycophantic media never once said "hey, wait a minute. You said x, now you are saying y."
We must read Clintons new book "I'll never wag my finger again". It's bound to be a best seller.
the impeached one doth protest too much!!!
he relies and quotes Richard Clark and the 9/11 commission report...both state that he didn't do squat and that he treated the first WT Tower bombings as a criminal event!...now he wants the world to believe that he was gung ho and wanted to kill bin laden...when he really was more concerned with Monica under his desk!
this impeached liar is trying to reclaim, white wash and polish up his legacy..."but that all depends on what is is!"
I don't remember anyone sugesting he was preoccupied with Bin Ladin because he WASN'T. The man claims to have been obsessed with him, but can't point to any sustained effort to kill or capture him. In fact, he publicly admitted that he didn't get him when he could have.
The man is a narcissist in the purest sense. Hillary, with her fits of rage and physical violence, is a classic boderline personality. No wonder they've stayed together so long. When a narcissist finds a boderline they become fused for life.... They'll kill eachohter or eventually die trying
Waht is wrong with this...man?
One thought keeps occuring to me as I see his ranting ... "the man doesth protest too much". Someone must have hit a raw nerve.
Clinton's "legacy" is getting more and more tainted.
Slick is a very clever, sly lying sack of sh*t. He was trying to fool gullible people into believing that he was all over Bin Laden during his presidency when in fact he was not. I, like you, have no memory whatsoever of Clinton ever uttering Bin Laden by name during his presidency, not once. History should sum up Clinton with one word:
LIAR!
I also don't recall the moonbats screaming that Clinton bypassed the UN to attack Serbia.
Pffft...and why should anyone believe or pay attention to Clinton's antics? This is a man who got on national attention and emphatically denied having sexual relations with Monica Screwwhenski. The guy knows how to act and "put on the dog". Are we now to believe he's a wounded saintly type of guy? Pffft!!!!!
I don't believe a thing this pathological liar says.
Just more self serving revisionist lies timed to minimize damage to his false "tough guy" image.
Bill subscribes to the "best defense is a good offence" when trying to cover his a$$.
He's still seething over the ABC, 9-11 story and took it out of Chris Wallace because he works for FOX. Bet he didn't go "off" on Keith Olberman!
His legacy will never change. I don't think he realizes that. And besides, Jimma Carter, it is the worst.
The more Slick Willy does this the more he sounds like a raving lunatic. As for Richard Clarke, he is another one working on faking a legacy. I watched a documentary with Clarke blaming GWB for not responding to the Cole attack. I seem to remember that the Cole happened on Clinton's watch.
These guys are in a hysterical panic that history will record what really happened and not what they believe happened.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.