Maybe Hume and Wallace have some compassion for the man. He was a President of the U.S. In relation to the Clinton interview, it spoke for itself. Why pile on.
He deserves contempt, not compassion. His lack of decisiveness and focus on satisfying his nether parts took predence over the defense of this country.
In relation to the Clinton interview, it spoke for itself. Why pile on.
It had nothing to do with piling on. Rather, someone needs to counter the lies he is spewing. Many of us don't need this information, but most of the American public does. This guy left office with 60% approval ratings. His wife is the odds on favorite to be the Dem nominee in 2008. We don't need Clinton's revisionist history.