Replies

Maybe Hume and Wallace have some compassion for the man. He was a President of the U.S.

He deserves contempt, not compassion. His lack of decisiveness and focus on satisfying his nether parts took predence over the defense of this country.

In relation to the Clinton interview, it spoke for itself. Why pile on.

It had nothing to do with piling on. Rather, someone needs to counter the lies he is spewing. Many of us don't need this information, but most of the American public does. This guy left office with 60% approval ratings. His wife is the odds on favorite to be the Dem nominee in 2008. We don't need Clinton's revisionist history.

Rather, someone needs to counter the lies he is spewing.

Correct... it's by not speaking out/not having a FOXNews that's put us in this position in the first place. Clinton's rewriting of history must be challenged wherever/whomever... period.

Many of us don't need this information, but most of the American public does.

One hundred percent correct... While I agree that the danger of appeasement was the major lesson to be learned from Hitler's rise and its disastrous aftermath, the effect of Goebbels' constant butchering of the truth was also a determinant in taking Germany, and hence the world, down a calamitous path. Clinton and his lackeys are attempting to overturn the true nature of his time in office. And efforts to point out the truth to the public can never be overdone.

Conservatives fight an uphill battle against demagogues like the Clintons. Furthermore,we have to battle against the human proclivities to envy the successful and to avoid toil in the pursuit of goods. This is a matter of fact that is borne out by the demographics of the political landscape. So, American Leftist twisting of the truth is every bit as dangerous as the practices of Hitler's propaganda machine. I say never pass up a chance to show Bubba's presidency it for what it was. The Cigar Man deserves no mercy when it comes to reporting the true nature of his Administration.

"...someone needs to counter the lies that he [Clinton] is spewing Many of us don't need this information, but most of the American public does. We don't need Clinton's revisionist history."

I hadn't thought of it in terms of countering his b.s.; I guess I assumed that the media whores would move on to a less embarrassing subject.

I'd like to see a law passed that a president who leaves office must not speak or write about politics, must never appear on tv, never give interviews, never intrude into the politics of foreign states, e.g., Carter, or he will be stripped of his pension, security and other perks. Of course, these attention whores get filthy rich on the lecture circuit, especially "lecturing" in places like Dubai and Beijing, so they don't need pensions.

Carter is an extremely destabilizing influence regarding our foreign policy in Latin American countries and elsewhere. It is a shame we cannot restrain these pipsqueak egomaniacs.