Posted on 09/23/2006 11:39:18 AM PDT by SeafoodGumbo
Time to update the Body Count?
"At least I tried. That's the difference in me and some, including all of the right-wingers who are attacking me now. They ridiculed me for trying. [The Bush administration] had eight months to try [and] they did not try. I tried. So I tried and failed," Clinton said.
old news........
OK, I confess, I think I saw it on dailykos or one of the leftist sites. Can't remember.
This is new to me, and I thought I had heard every clinton conspiracy theory going.
Found it on KTBS.com,,,They keep changing the site up,,,
Nothing in The Shreveport Times,,,MORE PAKI,,,Caught one
here in Bossier the other week,,,Export stuff? Watching.
I disinfect my scroll pad and keyboard after each look. It is like looking into the depths of depravity and lunacy.
Hm... a poison that takes two years to kill. Any medical Freepers care to comment?
In the meantime: Oliver Stone, please call the office!
My memory ain't so good,,I think he had liver problems,?
I don't think he was "Believed",,much,,around here,,So,,,?
Arkansas Dirt Nap
Evidently it was ethylene glycol (the stuff of anti-freeze) in a sport drink. Damaged his liver and he has been fighting the damage for two years.
I thought that stuff damaged kidneys, but I could be wrong.
susie
No, you are correct. Sorry, typing faster than thinking.
BTW a vet told me if your pet drinks anti-freeze get them drunk quickly (the pet not the vet). It keeps crystals from forming in the kidneys.
http://stuartbuck.blogspot.com/2006/09/more-on-dentist-david-graham.html
[WhatsAPundit said...
More interesting background on Mr. Khan:
"When Mohammad Jamal Khan pleaded guilty to trying to evade the requirement that large cash transactions be reported to banks and the government, federal prosecutors added an unusual caveat to his plea agreement: There would be no immunity from possible prosecution in the future for crimes relating to Sept. 11."
My guess: Witness Protection Program. Not that that would be good news to the Graham family....]
I don't know if this is the same guy, or if this info is accurate, but here's some more info:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,11069-2240908,00.html
[At the time of the 2003 inquiry the task force decided that they dare not risk losing Khan and ordered that he should be stopped at the BA ticket counter and told that he could not enter the US.
He said that this investigation had been entirely separate to another US inquiry taking place at the same time on another British militant, Mohammed Jamal Khan.
The FBI said in a statement this week that it believed that there could have been a mix-up over names. Mohammed Jamal Khan was sentenced to nine years in Britain this year for directing a terrorist organisation. He had been visiting the US since the 1990s and was under surveillance by the FBI.
Jamal Khan was from a different part of Britain, was born in Pakistan, was married with two children and lived with his elderly parents in Coventry, details that differ in all respects from Sidique Khan.
Suskind said last night: “There is no case of mistaken identity. Everyone involved knows the difference between the two guys. For somebody who is an expert in terrorism to mix these men up is like mixing up Tony Blair and Benny Hill.”]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.