Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Primary School (Why did Randy Graf kick Steve Huffman's ass in the CD8 GOP primary?)
The Tucson Weekly ^ | 21 September 2006 | Jim Nintzel

Posted on 09/23/2006 9:56:02 AM PDT by axes_of_weezles

email this article   print this article

PUBLISHED ON

SEPTEMBER 21, 2006:

Primary School

Lessons from last week's election

By

JIM NINTZEL email this author

Primary School

Why did Randy Graf kick Steve Huffman's ass in the Congressional District 8 GOP primary?

Huffman had plenty of advantages in this race: The backing of the business community, a campaign war chest packed with more than $670,000 (we'll be really interested in seeing the final spending figures when he files his next Federal Election Commission report), six-figure support from the National Republican Congressional Committee, the endorsement of outgoing Congressman Jim Kolbe and the general perception that he was the moderate alternative to Graf. But on Election Night, he got less than 38 percent of the vote, while Graf walked away with 42 percent and the win.

How come? Huffman was an aloof candidate who thought he could buy the seat with enough advertising. As a result, he arrogantly snubbed party activists, debate organizers, the press and anybody else who wasn't giving him money. Huffman has never been all that good with political schmoozing, but in this campaign--the most important of his life--he came across as particularly socially retarded. He skipped a lot of events; even at the ones he bothered to attend, he left early instead of shaking hands and making friends. On Election Night, Huffman's party was at his own house, while Graf had a lively affair at the Doubletree, and the official GOP soiree was down the street at the Clarion.

Bottom line: Huffman confused getting checks with getting votes, while Graf worked the electorate. If Huffman ever runs for office again, maybe he'll realize it's important to campaign.

Can Graf beat Democrat Gabrielle Giffords?

Well, he can--but Giffords enters the race as the favorite. She ran a great campaign, grabbing more than 54 percent of the vote and beating out her closest challenger, former newscaster Patty Weiss, by more than 23 percentage points. Plus, Democrats appear much more united than Republicans, with most of Giffords' primary opponents backing her. Weiss in particular was a class act on Election Night, showing up at Giffords' celebration and throwing her support behind the nominee.

While Republicans are making a show of uniting behind Graf, there's a lot of pessimism in the smoke-filled back rooms about his chances. Just look at the Zimmerman poll released before the primary: Giffords was leading Graf by 10 percentage points.

Giffords is obviously an attractive candidate to Democrats, but she's also seen as reasonable by moderate Republicans and the business community.

But with all the money that's going to be tossed around, Giffords is going to have to work hard for a win. And if she wins, she's going to have to work even harder to hang on to it in two years.

What were the big upsets on Election Night?

In midtown District 28, appointed state Sen. Paula Aboud managed to fend off a challenge from Rep. Ted Downing, who tried to convince voters to promote him to the Senate.

Aboud beat Downing by more than 8 percentage points in the winner-took-all Democratic primary, 54-46 percent. Aboud ran a fierce campaign, hammering Downing for his meddling in the effort to extend Rio Nuevo funding--which didn't earn him that many friends around City Hall--and his vote against increasing the penalty for spousal rape.

In yet another example of how Clean Elections levels the playing field and leads to polite philosophical debate, Aboud was aided by an independent campaign committee, Protect Tucson Women, which spent about $4,500 beating up on Downing. The committee had funding from a handful of sources, including $1,000 from Arizona List, a local political action committee dedicated to electing pro-choice Democratic women to office.

Arizona List is headed by Pam Sutherland, who told the morning daily she had no idea that Protect Tucson Women, which was headed by Bridget Riceci, would use the money to run an alleged push poll and send out a mailer busting on Downing for his vote against a spousal-rape bill.

Sutherland's denials might have been a little more credible if Protect Tucson Women hadn't used her address as their headquarters on their campaign filing.

The other big upset of the night came in Legislative District 26, which includes the Catalina Foothills, Casas Adobes and Oro Valley, where incumbent Republican Sen. Toni Hellon was knocked out by conservative challenger Al Melvin by more than 13 percentage points. In the same district, Melvin's running mate, David Jorgenson, won one of the two Republican slots, beating out Carol Somers and Lisa Lovallo. Pete Hershberger, the moderate incumbent, held onto his slot in LD 26. Jorgenson and Hershberger will be heavy favorites against Democrat Lena Saradnik in the general election.

Check out that under vote in the LD 26 House race. Why didn't those people vote?

The under vote--or the number of people not casting both of their two House votes--in Pima County's portion of LD 26 was 8,269, which is particularly staggering when you consider that only 8,323 Pima County residents voted for Hershberger, who got the most votes in the race, according to numbers posted on the Arizona Secretary of State's Web site on Monday, Sept. 18.

Jorgenson ran a "single-shot" campaign. Although every voter in a House race can vote for two candidates, they can choose to only vote for one candidate. Withholding that second vote gives your guy a better chance of winning, because it doesn't add to the vote total of his opponents.

Jorgenson pushed the idea that voters should cast a ballot for only him in the race--and it clearly paid off.

What was with all the robo-calls?

Wasn't that a nightmare? Pima County Recorder Ann Rodriguez says she had to talk at least one voter out of canceling her registration just so she wouldn't get any more calls.

The Skinny had both Democratic and GOP early ballots at the midtown bureau, and we got hammered by phone calls, especially from the Huffman campaign.

Robo-calls are a cheap way of reaching voters. But are they effective? In Huffman's case, clearly not.

Given how much people are bitching about them, candidates may want to dial back the robo-calls--but don't expect any relief before November.



TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aliens; cd8; cochise; elections; graf; huffman; nrcc; pima; tancredo; tucson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
Graf wont win, yeah right.

This is an article from the leftist weekly newsrag, local to Tucson.

They hated Huffman as much as conservatives.

1 posted on 09/23/2006 9:56:05 AM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; jmc813; axes_of_weezles; NapkinUser

Ping


2 posted on 09/23/2006 9:59:36 AM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: axes_of_weezles
But on Election Night, he got less than 38 percent of the vote, while Graf walked away with 42 percent and the win. How come?

Graf got less than 50% of the vote. Any bets that if there were a runoff (which there is not), graf loses.

3 posted on 09/23/2006 10:07:06 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

It was a 5 way race for republicans. Huffman pissed everyone off.
Of course your not going to get 50% when there are 5 candidates running.

It only takes a simple majority. Didnt you take civics?

He will take this district. Sorry if that pisses you off.


4 posted on 09/23/2006 10:08:57 AM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: axes_of_weezles

You want to make a wager on that ?

I say if graf loses, you cough up 1000 dollars to the republican congressional committee, rncc.

If graf wins, I cough up 1000 dollars to the candidate or pac or whatever of your choice.

we both cough up the money up front to a third disinterested party now and the winner gets a refund, the loser's money gets forwarded on.


5 posted on 09/23/2006 10:13:08 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: staytrue; Dane
It really hurts the open border, aiders and abettors of INVADERS that their open border pimp did not win so they are trying to help their favorite democrat.
6 posted on 09/23/2006 10:13:31 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

My money goes to Graf, win or lose.
I live here in Tucson.

It's obvious you dont.


7 posted on 09/23/2006 10:16:09 AM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: axes_of_weezles

It will be interesting to see if Gabby will try to duck debating Graf.


8 posted on 09/23/2006 10:17:15 AM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
Graf got less than 50% of the vote.

Which is almost always the case in crowded primaries for open seats.

Your "point" is stupid.

Any bets that if there were a runoff (which there is not), graf loses.

Your delusions are getting the best of you. Care to name me a state in which a candidate who gets 43% of the vote in a primary faces a runoff election?

9 posted on 09/23/2006 10:18:17 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

Novak calls az 8 as one of three republican seats that are "likely democrat".

http://www.humanevents.com/evansnovak.php?id=17141


10 posted on 09/23/2006 10:18:17 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
Novak calls az 8 as one of three republican seats that are "likely democrat".

Staytrue's number one talking point for the day...brought to you straight from Dem headquarters.

Does your screen name reference your devotion to Nancy Pelosi?

11 posted on 09/23/2006 10:20:00 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
With open border scum working to help the democrat, it is possible.
12 posted on 09/23/2006 10:20:45 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet
It will be interesting to see if Gabby will try to duck debating Graf.

She is way way ahead with 47 days until election day. OF COURSE SHE WILL DUCK DEBATES. SHE IS SO FAR AHEAD, THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL SHE WILL DEBATE.

13 posted on 09/23/2006 10:20:55 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Staytrue's number one talking point for the day...brought to you straight from Dem headquarters.

fyi, nancy pelosi kidnapped robert novak and brainwashed him into becoming a democrat mole.

14 posted on 09/23/2006 10:22:29 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

And Novak is a GOD right?

Or is he like the Pope, infallible.

The beltway bandits have been consistently wrong about Border Security and Amnesty and Catch and Release, while the folks in Southern Arizona suffer.


15 posted on 09/23/2006 10:22:46 AM PDT by axes_of_weezles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Novak hardly ever gets outside the Beltway, or its blinkered mentality.

And I said that your talking point comes from the Dems, which it does.

You're a traitor.


16 posted on 09/23/2006 10:24:15 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

By the way, Skippy.

Robert Novak is a registered Democrat.


17 posted on 09/23/2006 10:28:14 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: axes_of_weezles

your pal eternal vigilance accuses me of getting my orders and talking points from the democrats or pelosi when all I did was cite a human events/ novak column and you take his side.

have you considered that some on your side of the argument have brain lock ?


18 posted on 09/23/2006 10:28:19 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
You're a traitor.

Didn't take your medication today did you ?

19 posted on 09/23/2006 10:30:41 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
have you considered that some on your side of the argument have brain lock ?

What you call "brain lock" we call "helping conservative Republicans" and "keeping the Speaker's gavel out of the hands of Nancy Pelosi."

Personally, I think it's you with the Master Lock on your brain.

20 posted on 09/23/2006 10:31:10 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson