Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
Is there a difference between a "crash" and a gradual downturn? The media loves to call things "crashes," but it doesn't mean it's justified. I live in an area with extremely high-priced real estate. The market is not as robust as it was a year ago, but I would hardly describe it as disastrous.

Real estate is quite a bit different than stocks. When stocks go down they can really plummet, whereas real estate usually doesn't lose that much of it's value even in a downturn. The problem is that a large number of people have very little equity in their homes. So if a $400,000 home goes down to $300,000 those people have just lost $100,000 they don't have. Stocks on the other hand are ussually bought and paid for, so even if you lose big in the stock market it doesn't land you in debt.

100 posted on 09/22/2006 9:29:57 PM PDT by elmer fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: All

I think this guy might have to rob another bank...America is so cruel


112 posted on 09/22/2006 9:34:31 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: elmer fudd
That's more than a little bit backwards.

If you buy a stock, even on margin and the price falls and you sell it, you lose your money immediately. If, OTOH, you don't sell your stock and ride it out, probably you only have a paper loss.

The same things is reversed, IF you can't pay your mortgage and default. You lose your home AND you lose whatever equity you have in it; however, since you don't have any equity with an all interest mortgage, you haven't lost what the value of the house used to be or has become. You didn't have any money in it.

If you own your house and don't have to move, you don't "lose" anything at all, when/if prices go down. Neither do you GAIN anything, when/if prices go up......until you sell your house.

134 posted on 09/22/2006 9:43:14 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: elmer fudd

If you knew how many people were buying stocks (or gold) on margin, you'd be shocked.


138 posted on 09/22/2006 9:46:06 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: elmer fudd

When a house "goes down in value" from $400K to $300K, that is not a big deal? Most people finance 90% so they would have put down $40K, meaning that they have lost 250% of their investment. Even on margin, you can't lose more thant 200% of your investment in stocks.


197 posted on 09/22/2006 11:18:51 PM PDT by rebel_yell2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson