Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elmer fudd

When a house "goes down in value" from $400K to $300K, that is not a big deal? Most people finance 90% so they would have put down $40K, meaning that they have lost 250% of their investment. Even on margin, you can't lose more thant 200% of your investment in stocks.


197 posted on 09/22/2006 11:18:51 PM PDT by rebel_yell2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: rebel_yell2

Hey, good points. Hadn't thought of it that way before your post.

We paid off our house within 10 yrs. Many folks told us it was not a tax smart thing to do but we don't like being in debt for any reason. Now, from your points, I realize that we were actually protecting our investment. Thanks.


299 posted on 09/23/2006 12:15:53 PM PDT by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

To: rebel_yell2
When a house "goes down in value" from $400K to $300K, that is not a big deal? Most people finance 90% so they would have put down $40K, meaning that they have lost 250% of their investment. Even on margin, you can't lose more thant 200% of your investment in stocks.

That was exactly my point. When you lose money in the stock market it may suck, but at least you don't end up in debt and it's not particularly unusual for a stock to lose 25% of it's value. It happens and you try to pick a better stock next time. If housing prices do the same thing however it's a calamity.

305 posted on 09/23/2006 1:21:49 PM PDT by elmer fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson