Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News Sunday BILL CLINTON INTERVIEW (Rough transcript)
92206

Posted on 09/22/2006 7:08:06 PM PDT by BlueJ7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last

1 posted on 09/22/2006 7:08:08 PM PDT by BlueJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BlueJ7
President Bush NEVER had Osama in the sights like this.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4549030
Osama bin Laden: missed opportunities




2 posted on 09/22/2006 7:12:58 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueJ7
"I got to be president."

Eewwwww .... golly.

That about sums up the maturity level of this man.
3 posted on 09/22/2006 7:13:00 PM PDT by One_who_hopes_to_know
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69; Petronski
I'll start:

Posted by Howlin to Petronski
On News/Activism 09/22/2006 9:39:40 PM EDT · 348 of 437

Just for starters:

Clinton: Let's talk about it. I will answer all those things on the merits, but first I want to talk about the context in which this arises. I'm being asked this on the FOX network.

Ah, because you NEVER get asked IN DEPTH questions by all your pals in the freaking MEDIA.

ABC just had a right-wing conservative running their little pathway to 9/11, falsely claiming it was based on the 9/11 commission report with three things asserted against me directly contradictory to the 9/11 commission report.

Which they EDITED OUT!!!

And I think it's very interesting that all the conservative Republicans who now say I didn't do enough claim that I was too obsessed with bin Laden.

Name one; who said that, you damn liar.

All of President Bush's neo-cons that I was too obsessed with bin Laden

Again, who?

they had no meetings on bin Laden for nine months after I left office.

That is an out and out lie.

All the right wingers who now say I didn't do enough, said I did too much, the same people.

Names. Let's have them, dirtball.

They were all trying to get me to withdraw from Somalia in 1993 the next day after we were involved in Black Hawk Down and I refused to do it and stayed six months and had an orderly transfer to the United Nations.

Clinton's Black Hawk History

4 posted on 09/22/2006 7:14:33 PM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlueJ7

Would love to hear at least this level of journalistic integrity in asking questions regarding interviews with Hillary Clinton.

Can I get an Amen to that?


5 posted on 09/22/2006 7:15:11 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Excerpts from the August 2002 press briefing by Richard A. Clarke:

RICHARD CLARKE: There was no plan on al Qaeda that was passed from the Clinton administration to the Bush administration ... In January 2001, the incoming Bush administration was briefed on the existing strategy. [They] decided to ... vigorously pursue the existing policy [and] ... initiate a process to look at those issues which had been on the table for a couple of years.
In their first meeting [the principles] changed the strategy by authorizing the increase in funding [for covert action against al Qaeda] five-fold, changing the policy on Pakistan, changing the policy on Uzbekistan, changing the policy on the Northern Alliance assistance. [They] then changed the strategy from one of rollback with al Qaeda ... to a new strategy that called for the rapid elimination of al Qaeda.
QUESTION: What is your response to the suggestion in the [Aug. 12, 2002] Time [magazine] article that the Bush administration was unwilling to take on board the suggestions made in the Clinton administration because of animus against ... the foreign policy?
CLARKE: I think if there was a general animus that clouded their vision, they might not have kept the same guy dealing with [the] terrorism issue ... There was never a plan [in the Clinton administration].
QUESTION: What was the problem? Why was it so difficult for the Clinton administration to make decisions on those issues?
CLARKE: Because they were tough issues. One of the big problems was that Pakistan at the time was aiding the other side, was aiding the Taliban. In the spring [of 2001], the Bush administration ... began to change Pakistani policy. We began to offer carrots, which made it possible for the Pakistanis ... [to] join us and to break away from the Taliban. So that's really how it started.
QUESTION: Had the Clinton administration ... prepared for a call for the use of ground forces, special operations forces in any way?
CLARKE: There was never a plan in the Clinton administration to use ground forces. The military was asked at a couple of points ... to think about it. And they always came back and said it was not a good idea. There was never a plan to do that.
QUESTION: You're saying ... there was no plan; two, there was no delay; and that actually the first changes since October of '98 were made in the spring months just after the administration came into office?
CLARKE: You got it ...The other thing to bear in mind is the shift from the rollback strategy to the elimination strategy. When President Bush told us in March to stop swatting at flies and just solve this problem, then that was the strategic direction that changed the [policy] from one of rollback to one of elimination.
6 posted on 09/22/2006 7:15:24 PM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BlueJ7

To me Bubba comes off as a lying sack of Crap. No way he authorised a team to kill Bin Laden.


7 posted on 09/22/2006 7:15:41 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Clinton: Let's see what Richard Clarke said. Do you think Richard Clarke has a vigorous attitude about bin Laden?

Let's do just that!

See my post above!

Now if you want to criticize me for one thing, you can criticize me for this: after the Cole, I had battle plans drawn to go into Afghanistan, overthrow the Taliban and launch a full-scale attack search for bin Laden.

I wish for just ONE MINUTE Jim Robinson would let us use profanity.

There was NO "battle plan" for the USS Cole!

He is parsing again; notice Wallace asked him about Somlia and he tried to narrow it to Black Hawk down; and he most certainly did END THE MISSION the very next day!

8 posted on 09/22/2006 7:15:57 PM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
Lopez: What exactly was U.S. reaction to the attack on the USS Cole?

Miniter: In October 2000, al Qaeda bombed the USS Cole in Aden, Yemen. Seventeen sailors were killed in the blast. The USS Cole was almost sunk. In any ordinary administration, this would have been considered an act of war. After all, America entered the Spanish-American war and World War I when our ships were attacked.

Counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke had ordered his staff to review existing intelligence in relation to the bombing of the USS Cole. After that review, he and Michael Sheehan, the State Department's counterterrorism coordinator, were convinced it was the work of Osama bin Laden. The Pentagon had on-the-shelf, regularly updated and detailed strike plans for bin Laden's training camps and strongholds in Afghanistan.

At a meeting with Secretary of Defense William Cohen, Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Attorney General Janet Reno, and other staffers, Clarke was the only one in favor of retaliation against bin Laden. Reno thought retaliation might violate international law and was therefore against it. Tenet wanted to more definitive proof that bin Laden was behind the attack, although he personally thought he was. Albright was concerned about the reaction of world opinion to a retaliation against Muslims, and the impact it would have in the final days of the Clinton Middle East peace process. Cohen, according to Clarke, did not consider the Cole attack "sufficient provocation" for a military retaliation. Michael Sheehan was particularly surprised that the Pentagon did not want to act. He told Clarke: "What's it going to take to get them to hit al Qaeda in Afghanistan? Does al Qaeda have to attack the Pentagon?"

Instead of destroying bin Laden's terrorist infrastructure and capabilities, President Clinton phoned twice phoned the president of Yemen demanding better cooperation between the FBI and the Yemeni security services. If Clarke's plan had been implemented, al Qaeda's infrastructure would have been demolished and bin Laden might well have been killed. Sept. 11, 2001 might have been just another sunny day.

****They were the PENTAGON'S plans, not his 'battle plan.'

What a damn liar.


9 posted on 09/22/2006 7:16:53 PM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

Bubba shit head is a piss ant, move on, move to some country that allows older men to shove cigars around under aged girls.


10 posted on 09/22/2006 7:17:55 PM PDT by Squat (Deport the illegals now! Turn Home Depot's into the prisons to hold the illegals!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

This turd doesnt even wamnt the Bush administration to be able to interrogate prisoners and he is claiming he had a team to kill Bin Laden. I thought the CIA didnt do wet jobs.


11 posted on 09/22/2006 7:17:56 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BlueJ7

Clinton is half senile, half bent on destroying the Dim Rats in the next election, to preserve the chances of Hillary and get a place in a White House filled with seventy two virgin interns...


12 posted on 09/22/2006 7:18:18 PM PDT by Saint Louis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bookmarking


13 posted on 09/22/2006 7:18:37 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (who wants to be the bug to my windshield?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

I'll bet you've got some bookmarks that would refute what this POS is claiming.


14 posted on 09/22/2006 7:19:26 PM PDT by Howlin (Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BlueJ7
MELTDOWN

15 posted on 09/22/2006 7:22:00 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

All you say is right, and I think it is great Wallace asked him enough things to expose further what a hole this guy was.
Add that he gave China missile guidance and rocket technology to expose all our cities to Chinese nukes and you have perhaps the worst President of all time.

Had Carter not encouraged the birth of radical Islam with the 444 day hostage debacle, Clinton would win worst President hands down.

Might be a tie!


16 posted on 09/22/2006 7:22:03 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Saint Louis

Only half bent?


17 posted on 09/22/2006 7:22:32 PM PDT by Past Your Eyes (Do what you love and the ridicule will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: BlueJ7
"Now I never criticized President Bush and I don’t think this is useful. But you know we do have a government that think Afghanistan is 1/7 as important as Iraq."


President Bush has never criticized you about your failure, so why are you criticizing him you lying sack of sh^^.
19 posted on 09/22/2006 7:24:07 PM PDT by SeaBiscuit (God Bless America and All who protect and preserve this Great Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueJ7
..careful Willard--you're gonna to blow out your stitches...
20 posted on 09/22/2006 7:25:18 PM PDT by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson