Skip to comments.
Tradesports: GOP control of House approaching 60%!
Tradesports.com ^
| 09/22/06
Posted on 09/22/2006 11:18:42 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
This chart has the closing price @55.2%, but the LATEST Bid is 57.1!
(Excerpt) Read more at tradesports.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gop; tradesports
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: pabianice
Pabiance you were pushing this crap in August also. Give us a link with Archives from past elections or please be quiet.
In August your so called PAGE showed the Democrats with a 3 to 1 lead.
To: pabianice
Pabiance as a Trader I must say I looked at your site at
http://www.strategypage.com, it is interesting but easily manipulated.
First of all the Contract for the GOP House has been sold out for 2 months, which would date back to July and the bogus summer polling. With the winds changing towards the gOP there is no way for that contract to be now updated.
A Pretty Amateur site
To: Recovering_Democrat
Can you tell me where I can get the ticker for this site to put on my site?
43
posted on
09/22/2006 2:06:38 PM PDT
by
MaineVoter2002
(http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
To: TChris
...and Rove's "October Surprise" is yet to come! ;-)
44
posted on
09/22/2006 3:05:57 PM PDT
by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
To: Welike ike
45
posted on
09/22/2006 3:09:43 PM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
To: MaineVoter2002
I am not sure...I just pull it off the site itself.
(Go to the site, call up the odds, then right click on HOUSE GOP--open in new window--and you'll get the odds I put up on this board.)
46
posted on
09/22/2006 3:10:45 PM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
To: Welike ike
Well, yes, and Tradesports DOES move with the changing climate, just like the stock market. :)
47
posted on
09/22/2006 3:11:40 PM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
To: LS
Wow, did you make those predictions here on FR?? Darn good record LS. :)
48
posted on
09/22/2006 3:12:54 PM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
To: LS
I'd say the GOP are damn good campaigners.
NAH
It is the grass roots voters who absolutely hate the dems
49
posted on
09/22/2006 3:21:58 PM PDT
by
uncbob
To: Recovering_Democrat
Evidently the dem's Plan for America wasn't Fool-proof. It never is on that side.
To: Recovering_Democrat
The Senate is a far greater risk. The house has become so gerrymandered that very few seats are in play. The Senate is far more sensitive to national political trends.
51
posted on
09/22/2006 3:29:17 PM PDT
by
MediaMole
(9/11 - We have already forgotten.)
To: MediaMole
To: Recovering_Democrat
I did. And, if you care to search the threads, you can find them.
53
posted on
09/23/2006 2:59:42 PM PDT
by
LS
To: uncbob
Oh, I see. Leaders mean nothing. It's all the followers. Gotcha.
Sorry, you'll have to try harder. I've been in sales, and know that no matter how you package a dog product, you can't make people want it. The GOP ground game is good, but not that good.
54
posted on
09/23/2006 3:01:13 PM PDT
by
LS
To: LS
Oh I see it wasn't the Gun Owners the Pro Life people and anti gays in the military all royaly Poed at Clinton and the democrats that caused that seismic shift in 1994 it was the brillaint campaigning by the GOP leaders
55
posted on
09/23/2006 6:07:40 PM PDT
by
uncbob
To: uncbob
Hmm, seem to remember something called the "Contract with America," and some guy named Gingrich who conceived of nationalizing local house races. Could be wrong. Those same footsoldiers had been out there through 12 years of Reagan/Bush and hadn't done anything.
56
posted on
09/23/2006 6:32:51 PM PDT
by
LS
To: LS
Umm
Contract with America was a GOOD THING BUT exit polls showed vast majority never heard of it
It was Clinton was destroyed the democrats control of congress
57
posted on
09/24/2006 12:56:10 PM PDT
by
uncbob
To: LS
Could be wrong. Those same footsoldiers had been out there through 12 years of Reagan/Bush and hadn't done anything.
Yep they switched partys for the congressional races because of Clinton
BTW Genius Newt plredicted 25-30 more seats in 98
Where did he think those were coming from after that onslaught in 94
58
posted on
09/24/2006 12:59:52 PM PDT
by
uncbob
To: uncbob
So you blew your own point out of the water. If it was Clinton, then it is leadership, either good or bad.
59
posted on
09/24/2006 1:44:53 PM PDT
by
LS
To: uncbob
Give it a rest. It's all about leaders and their ability to motivate. G. H. W. Bush got fewer Republicans out than Reagan did. What happened to the "machine?" The "foot soldiers?" Bush/Rove, on the other hand, are masters at GOTV.
60
posted on
09/24/2006 1:46:37 PM PDT
by
LS
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson