Skip to comments.
DISABLED GAL CAN'T DECIDE LIFE OR DEATH (Court: retarded girl no competant to say she wants to live)
NY Post ^
| September 22, 2006
| DAREH GREGORIAN
Posted on 09/22/2006 8:54:28 AM PDT by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-315 next last
1
posted on
09/22/2006 8:54:28 AM PDT
by
presidio9
To: Coleus; wagglebee; wideawake; NYer; cpforlife.org; Grampa Dave; Aquinasfan; Salvation; Siobhan; ...
2
posted on
09/22/2006 8:55:50 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(Make Mohammed's day: Shoot a nun in the back.)
To: presidio9
The leftists' death-cult mentality is spreading.
When in doubt, rub 'em out!
Sickening...
3
posted on
09/22/2006 8:56:22 AM PDT
by
LIConFem
(Just opened a new seafood restaurant in Great Britain, called "Squid Pro Quid")
To: LIConFem
Instead, her mother, who is her legal guardian, gets to make the call - and she doesn't want her daughter on life support. Is there anything more beautiful than a mother's unconditional love?
4
posted on
09/22/2006 9:00:12 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(Make Mohammed's day: Shoot a nun in the back.)
To: presidio9
5
posted on
09/22/2006 9:02:16 AM PDT
by
wideawake
("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
To: presidio9
So "seven year olds" aren't deemed worthy of knowing if they want to live, hmmm?
Is that what this "esteemed" panel is saying?
Seems so to me. Disgusting.
6
posted on
09/22/2006 9:02:19 AM PDT
by
TruthConquers
(Delenda est publius schola)
To: presidio9
the woman has an IQ of 52, about the mental capacity of a 7-year-old If this is the standard, half of the posters at DU could be affected by this ruling
7
posted on
09/22/2006 9:03:00 AM PDT
by
digger48
To: presidio9
If the court is correct that she is not competent, she should just kill her mom. They cant hold her responsible.
8
posted on
09/22/2006 9:03:39 AM PDT
by
Niteranger68
(I gigged your peace frog.)
To: presidio9
9
posted on
09/22/2006 9:04:52 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: presidio9
I spoke with Terri's Dad,Bob Schindler on Monday.They have set up a foundation to fight cases where they are removing food and water by the suggestion of the panel at a hospital.The website is www.terrisfight.org .Right now they are fighting 2 cases in Texas.Anyone who needs more information can visit the site and there is a phone number on it to call if you need help.Also they are looking for contacts with the media to do live interviews on this.
10
posted on
09/22/2006 9:10:05 AM PDT
by
fatima
To: presidio9
Hmmm, does this mean children up to age of 7 can't be trusted to want to live?
Paging Peter Singer.
notdeadyet.org
11
posted on
09/22/2006 9:10:11 AM PDT
by
yellow rubber ducky
(One day I realized I've been living in Bizarro world.)
To: wideawake; presidio9
You wait. The pro-abortion gang will jump on this as grounds for pro-choice.
12
posted on
09/22/2006 9:18:43 AM PDT
by
Froufrou
To: TruthConquers; beaversmom
So "seven year olds" aren't deemed worthy of knowing if they want to live, hmmm? That is certainly what it sounds like to me. Disgusting. Guess they really will go after the kids (not just the babies) next.
13
posted on
09/22/2006 9:19:00 AM PDT
by
TXBubba
( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
To: Froufrou
The slippery slope just got a little steeper.
14
posted on
09/22/2006 9:20:34 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(Make Mohammed's day: Shoot a nun in the back.)
To: presidio9
This seems at odds with the Supreme Court decision that forbids capital punishment for low IQ criminals. It's OK for a hospital to kill a low IQ person who has committed no crime, but the state is forbidden to deal with a convicted criminal. What a screwed up judiciary.
15
posted on
09/22/2006 9:21:51 AM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: presidio9
This is just the tip of the iceberg. Children and adults with legal guardians have only very limited civil rights. In essense, the law regards them as "chattels", or, essentially, slaves.
For example, a child can be incarcerated in a psychiatric institution involuntarily, with no right to habeus corpus, that is, a reason for them to be put in hospital. This is very common with "problem children", and the institution will certify them "mentally ill" until their insurance, or their parents' money, runs out. Then they will miraculously recover and be released. This is an easy way for the wealthy, especially, who have children, then decide they don't like them, to shut them away until they are 18 or 21 years old, depending on the State.
Parents and guardians can force, or deny, most other forms of medical care; choice and degree of religion or none that the child is exposed to; schooling and education to a great degree.
They have complete control over the childrens' money and other assets of value. Parents or guardians usually can coerce the child to give them power of attorney, so often support trusts given to a child by someone else cannot be modified until the child is legally an adult. Otherwise such trusts would commonly be emptied by their parent or guardian and the child would be left with nothing.
The one thing a child can do, but must be done proactively or the parent/guardian can usually prevent it, is to appear before a judge and ask for "emancipation" from their parent/guardian. Usually this is only granted if they can prove to the judge that the parents/guardians are unfit as parents, engage in unlawful or abusive behavior, or are mismanaging the child's assets.
This is a two-way street, however, and the parents can just as easily emancipate the child.
One common trick by parents/guardians is to kick the child out of their home, then contact the police and claim the child is a runaway. The child is then arrested and held for days, and sometimes criminally charged. This establishes that they are "troublemakers", and makes further parental abuse possible.
To: presidio9
Err on the side of life. Why is this such a tough concept!
17
posted on
09/22/2006 9:23:20 AM PDT
by
sappy
To: presidio9; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping! Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
This is sickening, a 26 year old woman wants to live, but her mother wants her to die and the judge is siding with the mother.
18
posted on
09/22/2006 9:25:33 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: sappy
Last weekend my family celebrated the thirtieth birthday of one of its members. A year and a half ago, he woke up from a six-month "irreversible" coma with no brain activity.
19
posted on
09/22/2006 9:26:10 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(Make Mohammed's day: Shoot a nun in the back.)
To: 8mmMauser; T'wit; floriduh voter; BykrBayb
20
posted on
09/22/2006 9:26:43 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-315 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson