Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: calcowgirl
When's the Constitutional Amendment where we decided to become a Third World "Democracy"?
Oh yeah, IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!
Section III Article III their @$$.
2 posted on
09/21/2006 11:30:58 PM PDT by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: calcowgirl
Looks like Chavez has been to California.
3 posted on
09/21/2006 11:32:03 PM PDT by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: calcowgirl
The brainstorm behind Dr. Kozas effort, led by a seven-month-old group, National Popular Vote, was to abandon that approach and focus on creating interstate compacts new ways for Democrats to steal elections.
4 posted on
09/21/2006 11:34:55 PM PDT by
GOP_Raider
(Would you like to join the OFFICIAL Oakland Raiders ping list? Sure you would, send me freepmail.)
To: calcowgirl
7 posted on
09/21/2006 11:39:13 PM PDT by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
To: calcowgirl
More important, he said, is changing the way presidential campaigns are conducted in this country. Now, the candidates spend almost all of their time in a handful of battleground states like Ohio and Florida and ignore the rest of the country. This would force candidates to campaign nationally for every vote.
Sounds like "bull" to me. Who actually believes this stuff?? I would like to see a breakdown of where the greatest concentration of 50% of the U.S. population lives. I would suspect that it is in big cities, and if we started with the most populous big city, and worked our way down the list, I'll bet we wouldn't have to go too far until we had accounted for 50% of the U.S. population.
This means we would have the same problem that he describes above, only now condidates would campaign within a relatively small handful of large population centers, and ignore the rest of the country. Most states would probably never see a candidate, and even states like California would only see candidates campaigning in their big cities.
Furthermore, how do big cities tend to vote?? I would not be surprised to learn that the populations of big cities tend to vote more to the left than to the right. It seems that there is something about living in big cities that does something to people's collective IQ's.
This seems to be specifically designed to ensure more victories for liberals, and that Conservatives are shut out and marginalized. The fact that some RINO's are supporting it is meaningless window dressing. The "problems" described in the article could be made worse (unless your name is Al Gore). I hope that intelligent people stand up and put a stop to this.
9 posted on
09/21/2006 11:52:27 PM PDT by
Zetman
(I believe the children are the next generation.)
To: calcowgirl
"Dr. Kozas compact, if approved by enough legislatures, would commit a states electors to vote for the candidate who wins the most national votes, even if the candidate loses in that state."
Article 1 Section 10
"No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay."
It's not going to happen, as you have to get congressional approval if there is compact between states. Regardless, if Schwarzenegger signs this, then I will quit the Republican party and become an anarchist.
To: calcowgirl
20 posted on
09/22/2006 12:20:10 AM PDT by
Exton1
To: calcowgirl
The first fruit of his effort, a bill approved by the California legislature that would allocate the states 55 electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote, sits on Gov. Arnold Schwarzeneggers desk. The governor has to decide by Sept. 30 whether to sign it ... In the last election that would have thrown all of CA's electoral votes to Bush.
Although, if I were a Californian I wouldn't appreciate my vote being taken away and given to the residents in every other state.
21 posted on
09/22/2006 12:22:28 AM PDT by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: calcowgirl
These commie rat bastards will continue to subvert the Constitution until it becomes meaningless; or until the rest of us stop them.
To: calcowgirl
There is so much to comment upon....sheesh...where to start?
"He has concocted a plan for states to skirt the Electoral College system legally to insure the election of whichever presidential candidate receives the most votes nationwide."
Starts off wrong to begin with. It is not "legal" for states to enter into compacts with each other without the consent of Congress. This isn't going to happen anytime soon. Next, "skirting" the Constitution is not legal to begin with. You either follow it or you don't...no grey area here.
"The bottom line is that the system has outlived its usefulness, said Assemblyman Thomas J. Umberg, the Anaheim Democrat who sponsored the bill here. Its past time that Americans should elect their president by direct vote of the people."
Yeah, that direct election sure worked for Senators huh? One of the worst things done was allow for direct election of Senators. This took the last link to state's power away. Congress was meant to be kept in check by a House elected by the people and a Senate elected by State legislators. This meant that States had some say in the federal government as well as the people. It was a perfect system. Then direct election and WHAM....states became the lackeys of the feds...."no more highway money until you bend over and grab your ankles in front of the federal gods." It went from the United States of America to the United State of America.
Now they want to take away the power of the small states and the less populace states and give it to the urbanites and a few enclaves of liberals who tend to congregate like rats. This man should be hung for treasonous ideals.
23 posted on
09/22/2006 12:29:25 AM PDT by
MissouriConservative
(People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid - Kierkegaard)
To: calcowgirl
Here be the end of the United States, a name that is unfortunately lost on people these days.
The Centralized Democracy of America doesn't quite have that ring to it.
24 posted on
09/22/2006 12:29:58 AM PDT by
Crazieman
(The Democratic Party: Culture of Treason)
To: calcowgirl
The electoral college was designed to prevent the more densely populated areas from controlling the entire country. The last thing we need is for New York and L.A., et.al to determine who our leaders will be!
31 posted on
09/22/2006 1:05:30 AM PDT by
bjcintennessee
(Don't Sweat the Small Stuff)
To: calcowgirl
U.S. Constitution
Article I
Section 10
Paragraph 3:
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
35 posted on
09/22/2006 2:31:35 AM PDT by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: calcowgirl
I want the Governor to sign it. The Democrats will repeal it if California's electoral votes go to a Republican nationwide winner instead of the Democratic presidential candidate statewide winner. The Left can be too smart for their own good. Now let's hoist them on their scheme to make Electoral College votes go the popular vote winner in a national election.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
38 posted on
09/22/2006 2:45:34 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: calcowgirl
So, they want to turn our republic into a democracy?
Don't tell me -- they vote Democrat.
42 posted on
09/22/2006 3:03:52 AM PDT by
BlessedBeGod
(Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
To: calcowgirl
The bottom line is that this would require a constitutional amendment. The professor is obviously a marxist.
45 posted on
09/22/2006 3:25:44 AM PDT by
Leftism is Mentally Deranged
(The Leftist Marxist-Islamist Alliance: joining forces to destroy civilization.)
To: calcowgirl
He has concocted a plan for states to skirt the Electoral College system legally to insure the election of whichever presidential candidate receives the most votes nationwide. The first fruit of his effort, a bill approved by the California legislature that would allocate the states 55 electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote, sits on Gov. Arnold Schwarzeneggers desk. The governor has to decide by Sept. 30 whether to sign it ...Not only is it not legal, it's also unConstitutional.
46 posted on
09/22/2006 3:31:22 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(You know something is happening here but you don't know what it is, do you, Mr. Jones?)
To: calcowgirl
If millions of third worlders (Mexico, Cosa Rica, Ecuador, Guatamala, etc) flood the Southwest US, and vote overwhelmingly for their "pet" candidate, one who happens to be a danger to America, our national electoral process would be in great jeopardy.
THAT's why the Founding Father's ELECTORAL COLLEGE was so brilliant in its concept and implementation.
It is designed to prevent exactly the thing which I see happening with the ongoing invasion of ONE ethnic culture to ONE geographic area of the USA.
47 posted on
09/22/2006 3:52:54 AM PDT by
Edit35
To: All
This would only go into effect if ALL states change the way they assign electoral votes. Even then each state could assign electoral votes however they want. Arnold should not buy into this crap even though it would benefit the Republicans right now, in 2000 we would have lost to Al Gore(shudder)if this was implemented nation wide.
53 posted on
09/22/2006 4:50:00 AM PDT by
calex59
(Hillary Clinton is dumber than a one eyed monkey with a brain tumor(credit to Harley69))
To: calcowgirl
As if the people in California didn't have enough excuses not to vote here comes another one.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson