Posted on 09/20/2006 10:26:44 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
>>Why? Are those threads positive about the long term viability of capitalism vs. collectivism?
Why? Because I don’t believe the worst economy since Hoover is upon us?<<
No and no. It is because as you demonstrate with your questions above, a lack of understanding of core values and issues, but choose to pounce on sentences and respond to what you want the other person to have said, as opposed to what they actually posted.
I have no time for that.
bye.
You posted something relevant? All I've seen from you is blather about us heading into another great depression. That means you don't know what a depression is nor do you have a clue as to what it was like leading up the the last great depression. Trying to have a "serious" discussion with someone like this is indeed a waste of time.
PS That thread sure was a trip down memory lane! To think these guys are still busy spreading their misinformation in spite of all the has transpired—they truly have no shame! Which is why I won't give them the time of day anymore. Having said that, you going back and finding this thread makes me think we should start a collection of all their idiotic statements so they can be posted when needed as a public service warning to unsuspecting FReepers. Just a thought.
All the best—GGG
You forgot the /Sarcasm Off> notation!
You know what, am 452? Just as a matter of principle, you cannot ascribe whatever it is that you are trying to ascribe after the fact. Prove it, or stfu. Don’t give us this dancing-on-the-grave-I-told-you-so stuff.
Bump! You said a mouthful there!
Man, what a state we find ourselves in . . . the government interfered in the market to the point where the government must interfere more in the market. And "conservatives" are leading the way.
Sorry, you have to be more specific.
Think about this for a minute. Things go haywire, through no fault of our own, and yet people are pinging us to inform us that we are to blame. How pathetic is that?
You called it.........and kudos for taking all the patronizing comments with good grace......you "doom and gloomer"!
I did try to prove it back then only to be called a protectionist doom and gloomer.
So, in other words, because you made an unknown argument regarding an unknown subject, where people making unknown arguments rubbed it in your face, you can ping me to a thread an chortle that “you won.” Brilliant.
What was your original screen name? Maybe you can brag about your original posts?
I can’t stop laughing!!
It was as true back then as it is now. Some things never change.
sw
There’s hoopla?
.....LMAO. We knew these ass clown shills WERE full of crap back then....
Your Obamalike twisting of my post is out of context.
My post was correct. The housing market had some softness but has returned. To be sure there are some soft spots still but a large portion of the country has moved on.
The problem now is not the housing market, it is the financial market. Your desire for prescience is misdirected at the housing market.
My original points on the solution are now being borne out. I thought bankers at banks would take control and the work out specialists would take control. That was not done by the bankers because it became a legal rather than a banking problem. The RTC will perform the workouts. Some will be able to work out, others will not.
Bankers will solve the problem, then turn the residual foreclosures over to the lawyers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.