Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
And low-income households today are far more likely to be headed by a single parent than low-income households 25 years ago.

Twenty-five years ago you were more likely to find households with one wage earner, now for most people in most areas, its commonly accepted that it takes two wage earners to support a family.

117 posted on 09/20/2006 11:55:51 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: lucysmom
And yet in many of those cases, having a second wage earner is completely extraneous and does not "pay off" in the long run.

When you add all of the costs associated with having a second income in a family (second car, work clothing, child care, stupid government programs that are nothing more than expensive day care, etc.), you often find that a second spouse who works for a salary of $60,000 per year is actually working for less than the minimum wage.

118 posted on 09/20/2006 12:07:19 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: lucysmom

"Twenty-five years ago you were more likely to find households with one wage earner, now for most people in most areas, its commonly accepted that it takes two wage earners to support a family [at a higher standard of living]."


150 posted on 09/21/2006 6:51:29 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson