Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

Who is idiot Gallagher, looks like Bush showed poor judgement in trusting him when the fellow betrays him less than 24 hours after making a promise


5 posted on 09/19/2006 1:49:17 AM PDT by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mount Athos

They do that to us at work; tell us something that we aren't supposed to tell, hoping that we will. Nobody in their right mind would tell reporters something "off the record" and expect it to stay a secret. He knew at least one of them would tell and probably planned it that way. Besides, he didn't really tell them any classified information. :-)


28 posted on 09/19/2006 2:33:29 AM PDT by Melinda in TN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Mount Athos
"Who is idiot Gallagher, looks like Bush showed poor judgement in trusting him when the fellow betrays him less than 24 hours after making a promise"

No, no, no. A political, "off the record" does not mean the discussions are secret. It means simply that the conversations do not reflect an official policy view of the President or the Executive. So, any person who attends can give their interpretation of what the President said, or meant, but it is merely that, their interpretation of a casual conversation.

Surely nobody thinks that the President or his advisers (Rove and Snow) would allow that statement to be made if they did not want it floated out there for people to reflect on. I for one think it is a fairly reasonable position. Do we really want to put ourselves in the position as identifying all of Islam and more than a billion adherents as enemies? It seems to me the President is merely affirming exactly what he has been saying for the last five years.
42 posted on 09/19/2006 3:11:08 AM PDT by spatso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Mount Athos

Bush would show poor judgement if he trusted Gallagher a second time.


92 posted on 09/19/2006 4:35:27 AM PDT by RangerM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Mount Athos

Bus was well aware that they would run out there and say things....why else even bother having these guys there? New commentators are NEVER "off the record", even the conservatice-minded ones. Bush is obviously well aware of that and was happy to use that to his advantage. I wonder if that's why Rush didn't attend...he wants to be able to talk about President's comments, and a off the record format would put him in a wee bit of a moral conflict, which his fellow talkers seemed to b willing to toss aside. Has Hannity talked much about the President's comments? He was there.


145 posted on 09/19/2006 6:13:26 AM PDT by GLH3IL (What's good for America is bad for liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Mount Athos

looks like Bush showed poor judgement in trusting him when the fellow betrays him less than 24 hours after making a promise.


Do you really believe that bush didn't want the whole dog and pony show broadcast far and wide?

He used the "off the record ploy" so he could deny anything that got bad press.

If it hadn't been for the fact that armstrong williams poped off about being on the payroll, this wouldn't have been necessary.

after all, why do you think limabaugh wasn't there?


233 posted on 09/19/2006 9:35:29 AM PDT by WhiteGuy (It's about the People Who Count the Votes................. - Wally O'Dell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson