To: BIGLOOK
That's a FANTASTIC picture. It really shows the changes that were made to modernize the ship...looks like they added lots of missile launchers, removed the old 5" turrets along the sides amidships, added the helipad on the stern, and generally cleaned things up.
Sadly, the old battlewagons probably are impractical to modernize and redeploy, but I'd sure love to be proven wrong. They'd be somewhat vulnerable to modern anti-ship missiles, but probably no more vulnerable than any other ship, and maybe less than most since they're built so strongly. Then combine the sheer power of those 16-inch guns with modern artillery technology, and the mind boggles to think of the hell one of those ships could rain down within thirty miles of a coast.
}:-)4
31 posted on
09/18/2006 8:21:01 PM PDT by
Moose4
(Dirka dirka Mohammed jihad.)
To: Moose4; IronJack
They'd be somewhat vulnerable to modern anti-ship missiles, but probably no more vulnerable than any other ship, and maybe less than most since they're built so strongly.
The BB would have a compliment of pickets like the modern Carrier Task Force or Battle Group.
Then combine the sheer power of those 16-inch guns with modern artillery technology, and the mind boggles to think of the hell one of those ships could rain down within thirty miles of a coast.
Look at any Mid East map and you'll see if we owned the coasts, ports and cities, the enemy would inherit the deserts. Let 'em pound sand.
38 posted on
09/18/2006 8:35:31 PM PDT by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson