Skip to comments.
Hubris (Responding to Corn Responding to Me) - Victoria Toensing
NationalReview ^
| 9-17-06
| Victoria Toensing
Posted on 09/17/2006 8:38:19 PM PDT by STARWISE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: STARWISE
In reading this Toensing busts Corn doing a Clinton with his saying that he never identified her as covert. He's right, he didn't use that term, he used the term undercover. She also makes it pretty obvious to anyone in the know that Corn played a major role in helping his friends, the Wilsons.
These people bank on the fact that most people accept the DNC/leftist spin as the truth. When confronted with the truth they obfuscate and spin. When that doesn't work they run away and hide knowing that the media will not do anything to support their exposure.
To: Howlin
Corn is such a flake that if he had even a kernel of intelligence he wouldn't think of stalking Victoria because she would confuse him so much his brain would pop and he would get lost in a maize.
22
posted on
09/17/2006 9:10:36 PM PDT
by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
To: Enterprise
One of the most enjoyable moments on TV as far as I'm concerned was one morning on CSPAN (before Lamb ruined the show by not letting two people be on at once) when Victoria cleaned Anne Lewis' clock about Bill Clinton.
She's simply magnificent.
23
posted on
09/17/2006 9:12:28 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(Declassify the Joe Wilson "Report!")
To: STARWISE
Hardly the situation here where Plame went daily to Langley, and where the CIA press person admitted to Novak she was employed by the agency. Only MSM slime merchants pretend that the CIA press office confirms the employment of undercover officers.
24
posted on
09/17/2006 9:13:55 PM PDT
by
freespirited
(We have met the enemy and it is Wal-Mart. ---The Democratic Party)
To: Howlin
I've always liked her. I remember though, that during the Clinton years, there was some sort of threat made either against her or her husband, and she was worried about it. I am constantly grateful that those grifters are out of office.
25
posted on
09/17/2006 9:15:19 PM PDT
by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
To: STARWISE
26
posted on
09/17/2006 9:17:43 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: STARWISE
Corn gets popped.
I'm surprised he didn't scratch her eyes out...
27
posted on
09/17/2006 9:17:43 PM PDT
by
Doctor Raoul
(New York Times? Get a rope!)
To: STARWISE
I'd say he was creamed!
28
posted on
09/17/2006 9:19:23 PM PDT
by
jellybean
(Proud to be an Ann-droid and a Steyn-aholic)
To: Enterprise
29
posted on
09/17/2006 9:22:47 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
To: SuziQ
I keep waiting form someone to make an ad hominy remark. But then, that would take grits.
30
posted on
09/17/2006 9:26:16 PM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: piasa
But then, that would take grits.Well, I'm a Mississippi gal, so I ARE a GRITS!
31
posted on
09/17/2006 9:28:48 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: STARWISE
I'm sorry. I don't know what got into me. I better stop or someone will call the cobs on me.
32
posted on
09/17/2006 9:29:42 PM PDT
by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
To: Enterprise
33
posted on
09/17/2006 9:38:40 PM PDT
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
To: STARWISE
Corn takes it in the cornhole.
To: SuziQ
LOL -- you're TRUE GRITS.
I'm instant GRITS.
35
posted on
09/17/2006 9:40:31 PM PDT
by
onyx
(1 Billion Muslims -- IF only 10% are radical, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
To: STARWISE
I would daresay that dear David has been Corn-holed.
36
posted on
09/17/2006 9:41:21 PM PDT
by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: Sir Gawain
ONE minute and FIVE seconds faster you are, damn you! LOL
37
posted on
09/17/2006 9:42:05 PM PDT
by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: Howlin
Howlin,
Look at this mess on McDermott. So very confident that no WMDs would be found in Iraq. I want to know what he knew, when did he know and how did he know it.
I have come to the conclusion (code for read my tagline), the Dems attempts to drive Bush from office and short circuit the war are attempts to protect some one(s) in the Democrat Party. Bottom line. The party is corrupt and many of its elected officials evil to the bone. The are afraid of the secrets that are locked up in those still to be translated documents and equally afraid of information will come out in a truely free Iraq.
Yeah, a tinfoil hat rant for sure. But I have been following politics for a long time and have never seen this level vitriol, intellectual dishonesty, deceipt from the Democrat Party. All for power? That is the short, easy answer. The Dems are in a race against time and their existence as a party depends on them winning the race.
From Wikipedia.
Visit to Iraq in 2002
Rep. McDermott visited Iraq in 2002, prior to the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. He received sharp criticism from conservatives, both for his visit and for his prediction that President George W. Bush would "mislead the American public" to justify military action. During the run up to the Iraq war, McDermott insisted that no WMDs would be found in Iraq.
After his visit to Iraq, Rep. McDermott received a $5,000 contribution to an unrelated legal defense fund from Shakir al Khafaji, an Iraqi-American businessman with alleged ties to the Oil for Food scandal. McDermott returned the contribution in 2004 after it was questioned in the media. Aides asserted that McDermott had no prior knowledge of Khafaji's alleged connections to Iraqi oil money.
McDermott's opponents frequently use the nickname "Baghdad Jim" to call attention to his controversial Iraq visit.
38
posted on
09/17/2006 9:42:56 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
To: Mo1
Don't have any articles, but the Nation did give Wilson an award......for truth-telling. laughing here!"A Little Literary Flair"
From the July 26, 2004 issue - Weekly Standard: Joe Wilson wasn't a truth-teller.
by Matthew Continetti
"ONE DAY LAST OCTOBER, Ambassador Joe Wilson, his wife Valerie in tow, traveled to the National Press Club in downtown Washington, D.C., for lunch. It was a big day for Wilson . He was the guest of honor at a banquet thrown by the Nation Institute, which publishes the Nation, the venerable lefty weekly. Daniel Ellsberg was there. So was New Jersey senator Jon Corzine. Towards the end of lunch, plates of cold salad shunted aside, Wilson was invited onstage. Looking the part of a globetrotting former diplomat in his Zegna suit and trademark Hermès tie, he launched into a tirade against the Bush administration, which he claimed had ignored the findings of a trip he took to Niger in February 2002 to investigate claims that Saddam Hussein's Iraq had tried to acquire uranium there. His trip had disproved those claims, he continued, yet his findings were ignored. And when he went public with his story, the administration had tried to "silence" him by leaking to the press that his wife worked for the CIA.
There was much applause. And there was even more applause when Wilson then accepted the first-ever Ron Ridenhour Award for Truth-Telling, along with the award's $10,000 prize. (Ridenhour was the soldier who exposed the My Lai massacre in 1969.)"
Also of interest:
THE NATION - On the far left, The Nation magazine and its Nation Institute have been supported by OSI (Open Society Institute). The magazine published a generally flattering piece about the Soros-funded Center for American Progress. http://www.aim.org/special_report/A2089_0_8_0_C/
39
posted on
09/17/2006 9:44:06 PM PDT
by
windchime
(One war~many fronts.)
To: Howlin
The point of that post being the Wilson/Plame non-story is just one angle of the Dems attack. I cannot help but believe (another invitation to check my tagline) this was part of a larger coordinated effort to remove a president from office for the reasons stated in my prior post.
40
posted on
09/17/2006 9:48:34 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson