Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Depressing Times (Victor Davis Hanson, must read)
Work and Days ^ | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 09/17/2006 8:35:35 AM PDT by Allan

Depressing Times

Oriana Fallaci, RIP, the Pope, and a Sad Age

Rarely has the death of a public intellectual affected me as much as the passing of Oriana Fallaci. I never met her, and only received a brief note once from her accompanying a copy of The Rage and the Pride. The story of her career is well known, but her death, at this pivotal time, was full of paradoxes and yet instruction as well.

Radical Islam is, among other things, a patriarchal movement, embedded particularly in the cult of the Middle-Eastern male, who occupies a privileged position in a society that can be fairly described as one of abject gender apartheid. Islamism is also at war with the religious infidel, not just the atheist—and, in its envy and victimhood, fueled by a renewal of the age-old hatred of the Christian.

But so far, with very few exceptions other than the lion, Christopher Hitchens, the courageous William Shawcross, and a few others, the Left has either been neutral or anti-American in this struggle. And few Christians in positions of influence and respect have publicly defended their faith and the civilization that birthed it.

Candor, after all, can get one killed, exiled, or ostracized—whether a Danish cartoonist, a Dutch filmmaker, a Wall Street Journal reporter, or a British-Indian novelist. So here, ill and in her seventies, returned Ms. Fallaci one last time to take up the hammer and tongs against radical Islam—a diminutive woman of the Left and self-proclaimed atheist who wrote more bravely on behalf of her civilization than have most who are hale, males, conservatives, or Christians.

Her fiery message was as timely as it was caricatured and slandered: Muslims who leave the Middle East to live under the free aegis of the West have a moral duty to support and protect the civilization that has welcomed them, rather than romanticize about what they have forsaken; Christianity is more than a religion, but also a powerful emblem of the force of reason, in that it seeks to spread belief by rational thought as well as faith; and that affluent and leisured Westerners, bargaining away their honor and traditions out of fear and for illusory security, have only emboldened radical Islam that seeks to liquidate them.

I wish she were still alive to scoff at the politically correct, the appeaser, and the triangulator, but alas she is gone, defiant to the last.

Bene dictum?

And what are we to make of poor Benedict XVI, the scholastic, who, in a disastrous display of public sensitivity, makes the telling point, that Christianity, in its long evolution to the present, has learned to forsake violence, and to defend its faith through appeals to reason—and thus can offer its own experience in the current crisis of Islam. And by quoting from the emperor rhetorician Manuel Paleologus—whose desperate efforts at strengthening the Morea and the Isthmus at Corinth a generation before that awful Tuesday, May 29, 1453 all came to naught—the Pope failed to grasp that under the tenets of radical Islam of the modern age, context means little, intent nothing, learning less than zero. If a sentence, indeed a mere phrase can be taken out of context, twisted, manipulated to show an absence of deference to Islam, furor ensues, death threats follow, assassins load their belts—even as the New York Times or the Guardian issues its sanctimonious apologies in the hope that the crocodile will eat them last.

We learned the now familiar rage with the Danish cartoons, Theo Van Gogh, the false flushed Koran story, the forced change of “Operation Infinite Justice” to “Enduring Freedom”, the constant charges of “Islamaphobia”, and a horde of other false grievances that so shook the West, traumatized in fear of having its skyscrapers, planes, trains, buses, nightclubs, and synagogues blown apart or its oil cut off.

So, yes, we know the asymmetrical rules: a state run-paper in Cairo or the West Bank, a lunatic Iranian mullah, a grand mufti from this or that mosque, can all rail about infidels, “pigs and apes”, in language reminiscent of the Third Reich—and meet with approval in the Middle East and silence in the West. But for a Westerner, a Tony Blair, George Bush, or Pope Benedict to even hint that something has gone terribly wrong with modern Islam, is to endure immediate furor and worse. In short, no modern ideology, no religious sect of the present age demands so much of others, so little of itself.

In matters of the present war, I have given up on most of the neoconservatives, many of whom, following the perceived pulse of the battlefield, have either renounced their decade-long, pre-September11 rants to remove Saddam (despite the 140,000 brave souls still on the field of battle who took them at their word), or turned on the President on grounds that he is not waging the perfect fight and thus is not pursuing the good war. The Paleo-right is as frightening as is the lunatic Left. My old Democratic party is long dead, their jackals trying to tear apart the solitary and stumbling noble stag Joe Liebermann, the old center taken over by the Kerry and Soros billionaires, and the guilt-ridden academic, celebrity and media cadres.

So we really are left with very little in these pivotal times—the will of George Bush, of course, the Old Breed unchanged since Okinawa and the Bulge that still anchors the US military, the courage and skill of a very few brave writers like a Hitchens, Krauthammer, and the tireless and brilliant Mark Stein, but very, very few others. No, this is an age in which we in the West make smug snuff movies about killing an American President, while the Taliban and the Islamists boast of assassinating the Pope.

So long may you run, Ms. Fallaci, you who by now have learned that, yes, there is a soul, and, yes, yours was indeed saved for eternity if only for its singular courage and honesty alone. And dear Pope: clarify, contextualize, express sorrow over the wrong interpretation of your remarks, but please don’t apologize for the Truth—not now, not ever.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: benedict; fallaci; hanson; islam; islamevilempire; moslems; oriana; orianafallaci; pope; popetrop; ratzinger; trop; vdh; victordavishanson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: Allan; zot; Interesting Times; SeraphimApprentice; Dark Skies

Thank you for posting this.

The payoff line is:
"...the Pope failed to grasp that under the tenets of radical Islam of the modern age, context means little, intent nothing, learning less than zero.

"If a sentence, indeed a mere phrase can be taken out of context, twisted, manipulated to show an absence of deference to Islam, furor ensues, death threats follow, assassins load their belts—even as the New York Times or the Guardian issues its sanctimonious apologies in the hope that the crocodile will eat them last."


41 posted on 09/17/2006 10:34:45 AM PDT by GreyFriar ( (3rd Armored Division - Spearhead))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar
We don't actually know that the Pope fail to understand that his speech would be twisted. He may have been counting on it to prove his point that islam is completely irrational.

So far, his apology is a non-apology (he is sorry the islamic world misunderstands his lecture and takes erroneous offense)...and he hasn't retracted a darn thing.

I am still hoping that the Pope knows exactly what he is doing. Except for having to issue a "non-apology" he has demonstrated an uncanny understanding of islam's nature.

42 posted on 09/17/2006 10:41:45 AM PDT by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Very true, he knows the enemy!


43 posted on 09/17/2006 11:57:20 AM PDT by GreyFriar ( (3rd Armored Division - Spearhead))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

BTW, thanks greatly for your service to the Country!


44 posted on 09/17/2006 1:05:42 PM PDT by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Allan
The Brave? Not just so -- there is a better word in these times ...

The RESOLUTE.

45 posted on 09/17/2006 1:12:23 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
"No, he hasn't forgotten about you. But where are you in pirnt? Where are you on television delivering commentary? Where are your sermons? Where are your newspaper articles? Where are your books?"

hey you're getting a lot of this lately :-D and it's not just me !

46 posted on 09/17/2006 3:11:25 PM PDT by dangerfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dangerfield

I think he was being sort of general. He doesn't know me!


47 posted on 09/17/2006 5:16:30 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Allan
Victor Davis Hanson gets it. Islam is a faith that demands much of others but little of itself. And the West is too frightened to hold Muslims up to the highest standards as though that was unfair to them. It is unfair to the victims of Islamic terror to countenance Muslim violence as in not demanding Muslims grow up to live in our time might well end the War On Civilizations. If don't have the courage to press ahead with the latter, we will assuredly get more of the former. The die for the West is cast.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

48 posted on 09/17/2006 5:28:07 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allan; neverdem; Lando Lincoln; quidnunc; .cnI redruM; yonif; SJackson; dennisw; monkeyshine; ...

Oriana Fallaci, RIP, the Pope, and a Sad Age



    Victor Davis Hanson Ping ! 

       Let me know if you want in or out.

Links: FR Index of his articles:  http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=victordavishanson 
His website: http://victorhanson.com/     NRO archive: http://www.nationalreview.com/hanson/hanson-archive.asp

49 posted on 09/18/2006 4:53:45 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allan; Tolik
And by quoting from the emperor rhetorician Manuel Paleologus—whose desperate efforts at strengthening the Morea and the Isthmus at Corinth a generation before that awful Tuesday, May 29, 1453 all came to naught—the Pope failed to grasp that under the tenets of radical Islam of the modern age, context means little, intent nothing, learning less than zero.

All I need to know about Islam.

50 posted on 09/18/2006 5:22:44 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
I thought I was a neo-con but I'm still with Dubya so I must be Old Guard.

LOL. Me too. Glad he straightened me out. But then we don't care if we get invited to Beltway cocktail parties.

51 posted on 09/18/2006 5:35:39 AM PDT by Bahbah (Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stripes1776

"But where are you in pirnt? Where are you on television delivering commentary? Where are your sermons? Where are your newspaper articles? Where are your books?"

Most of us do not have these opportunities, but we all have liberals in our workplaces who spout utter nonsense and we don't answer them. Many have relatives who feel free to blast the President, Republicans and the USA around the family table, and we never state our case for America. Liberals have one virtue that conservatives lack: the courage of their convictions. Every conservative patriot should resolve that when confronted with liberal ideology, it will be answered. If they feel free to bring up the subject, it is a moral imperative that they be challenged by the other side. "Evil triumphs when good men do nothing."


52 posted on 09/18/2006 5:50:35 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Wombat101

make that two of us.


53 posted on 09/18/2006 6:02:31 AM PDT by steel_resolve (Do you know what a bigot is? Someone winning an argument with a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: montag813
And dear Pope: clarify, contextualize, express sorrow over the wrong interpretation of your remarks, but please don’t apologize for the Truth—not now, not ever.

I've been watching this with anxiety and hope; and my considered judgment is, he did not apologize.

Read this.You decide.

54 posted on 09/18/2006 6:17:13 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (What does the LORD require of thee, but to act justly, love tenderly, and walk humbly with thy God?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Allan

The most disturbing effect of militant Islam and its lack of tolerance for any criticism, real or imagined, is the self-censorship that now prevails in the MSM and among our political leaders. I doubt we will ever hear Bush say Islamofacism again.


55 posted on 09/18/2006 6:23:19 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
I just tried the link I post above,and for some reason it's not working. Please cut-and-paste this:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1703319/posts?page=2#2

And you may conclude that this was a tactical non-apology. Papa B16 is a chess player. He's thinking more than one move ahead, I'm sure.

56 posted on 09/18/2006 6:26:28 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (What does the LORD require of thee, but to act justly, love tenderly, and walk humbly with thy God?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RepoGirl

I love what the WSJ wrote about her. Her works had never been a main course of my reading; that's changing now.


57 posted on 09/18/2006 6:27:11 AM PDT by Loud Mime (An undefeated enemy is still an enemy.......war has a purpose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
We don't actually know that the Pope fail to understand that his speech would be twisted. He may have been counting on it to prove his point that islam is completely irrational.

The Pope knew exactly what he was saying.

The followers of Islam will react by taking to the street as expected.

It is the leaders of Islam that have been called into the Principal's office to explain themselves.

58 posted on 09/18/2006 7:32:46 AM PDT by oldbrowser (Good news is no news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
The Pope knew exactly what he was saying.

That's what I think also.

He's a vy clever and wise man and he has a plan to confront islam.

59 posted on 09/18/2006 7:40:07 AM PDT by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Allan
And dear Pope: clarify, contextualize,...

The radicals and liberals will never hear this...whether the words reach their ears or not.
60 posted on 09/18/2006 8:07:53 AM PDT by Pirate21 (The liberal media are as sheep clearing the path along which they will be lead to the slaughter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson