Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam's Man in Niger (Christopher Hitchens)
The Weekly Standard ^ | Sept 16, 2006 | Christopher Hitchens

Posted on 09/15/2006 10:03:34 PM PDT by jdm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: Howlin; jdm
Thanks for the ping Howlin

Google search on Wissam al-Zahawie

More Niger Documents

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:n9SReWzDhu8J:www.vanityfair.com/features/general/articles/060606fege02+%22Wissam+al-Zahawie%22&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=31

According to Martino, the documents were not given to him all at once. First, he explained, SISMI had La Signora give him documents that had come from the robbery: "I was told that a woman in the Niger Embassy in Rome had a gift for me. I met her and she gave me documents." Later, he said, SISMI dug into its archives and added new papers. There was a codebook, then a dossier with a mixture of fake and genuine documents. Among them was an authentic telex dated February 1, 1999, in which Adamou Chékou, the ambassador from Niger, wrote another official about a forthcoming visit from Wissam al-Zahawie, Iraq's ambassador to the Vatican.

The last one Martino says he received, and the most important one, was not genuine, however. Dated July 27, 2000, it was a two-page memo purportedly sent to the president of Niger concerning the sale of 500 tons of pure uranium per year by Niger to Iraq.

The forged documents were full of errors. A letter dated October 10, 2000, was signed by Minister of Foreign Affairs Allele Elhadj Habibou—even though he had been out of office for more than a decade. Its September 28 postmark indicated that somehow the letter had been received nearly two weeks before it was sent. In another letter, President Tandja Mamadou's signature appeared to be phony. The accord signed by him referred to the Niger constitution of May 12, 1965, when a new constitution had been enacted in 1999. One of the letters was dated July 30, 1999, but referred to agreements that were not made until a year later. Finally, the agreement called for the 500 tons of uranium to be transferred from one ship to another in international waters—a spectacularly difficult feat.

Martino, however, says he was unaware that they were forgeries. He was merely interested in a payday. "He was not looking for great amounts of money—$10,000, $20,000, maybe $40,000," says Carlo Bonini, who co-authored the Nigergate stories for La Repubblica.

61 posted on 09/16/2006 11:03:24 AM PDT by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

The Numbers Tell

So, as far as concrete evidence is concerned, the claim appears shaky at best, hardly the stuff that should make up presidential decisions. But could Iraqi interest have been converted into an actual deal? Three memos from officials on the ground said no-reports from the U.S. Ambassador to Niger Barbaro Owens-Kirkpatrick, Marine Corps General Carleton Fulford and Ambassador Wilson all concluded a deal was highly unlikely. Here is why:

Niger has two uranium mines, both owned by a French multi-national consortium (COGEMA) that receives all of Niger's ore for processing. With annual yellowcake production around 2,900 tons, Niger has the third-highest uranium production in the world behind Canada and Australia. Almost all of this yellowcake is exported to France, Japan, and Spain (the countries that make up the COGEMA consortium).

To obtain 500 tons of yellowcake as outlined in the NIE, Iraq would have had to: 1) import one-sixth of the uranium that Niger produces in an entire year, and 2) hide these imports from the consortium that tightly controls the mines and pre-sells the uranium to its members before it is even mined. These are not trivial matters. Even on a much smaller scale, French, international or U.S. authorities would certainly have detected such activity-especially after Niger signed a comprehensive safeguards agreement with the IAEA in June 2002.

The numbers tell us that Iraq's alleged interest in Niger uranium - even if true - never represented an immediate or significant threat to the United States. Simple math and common sense confirm that the claim should never have appeared in administration statements as evidence of an Iraqi nuclear weapon program.

http://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1595


62 posted on 09/16/2006 11:19:37 AM PDT by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Jeepers Mister Wilson, you lied....


63 posted on 09/16/2006 11:32:04 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Senate and intelligence is an oxymoron.


64 posted on 09/16/2006 11:34:09 AM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Repeal the 17th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
Iraq purchased uranium from Niger, Portugal and Brazil during the early stages of its nuclear program in the 1970s, but by the next decade halted these imports because it became self-sufficient in uranium production. In March 2003, Iraq had an inventory of over 500 tons of natural uranium and almost two tons of low-enriched uranium. This uranium was kept under IAEA seal and checked annually by the nuclear agency-theoretically unavailable to the Iraqi regime for use in a nuclear program.

Yada, yada, yada....why buy nuclear materials if you don' have a nuclear program?

65 posted on 09/16/2006 11:38:01 AM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jdm
How does Wissam al-Zahawie himself answer the question: What is a diplomat so senior--with or without nuclear experience--doing on a mission to a country to which he is not accredited?

Interesting comparison with another player in this saga: How does Wissam al-Zahawie JOE WILSON himself answer the question: What is a FORMER diplomat so senior--with or without nuclear experience--doing on a mission to a country to which he is not accredited?

66 posted on 09/16/2006 11:42:48 AM PDT by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Ping for later.


67 posted on 09/16/2006 12:20:19 PM PDT by 91B (God made man, Sam Colt made men equal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Thanks, piasa!


68 posted on 09/16/2006 12:20:30 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

Hi there Doctor Raoul! Hope all is well in your neck of the woods!


69 posted on 09/16/2006 12:35:58 PM PDT by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: jdm

My but our senators are stupid. I think they are clowns before the whole world (Coburn excepted).


70 posted on 09/16/2006 12:45:59 PM PDT by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Quick.... tell Joe Wilson about this


71 posted on 09/16/2006 12:48:02 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gdc314

The BBC, England's premier T.V. and radio channel.


72 posted on 09/16/2006 1:45:45 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

bttt


73 posted on 09/16/2006 1:47:12 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

Yes, all of those things, as well as earlier presidents ( Wilson's wife actually to over the reigns of power, when he was sick and that did NOT come out, until much later; for example )and actions.


74 posted on 09/16/2006 1:50:06 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AmeriBrit

Thanks and good for you! :-)


75 posted on 09/16/2006 1:50:59 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AmeriBrit
That IS a must read; I agree.

It went directly into my files and I sent it out, as well.

76 posted on 09/16/2006 1:54:38 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: piasa

bttt


77 posted on 09/16/2006 1:56:07 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: piasa

BTTT


78 posted on 09/16/2006 1:56:31 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Holy cow!
79 posted on 09/16/2006 1:58:13 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

bttt


80 posted on 09/16/2006 2:00:46 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson