Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor Signs 'Hands-Free' Cell Phone Bill(California)
Orange County Register ^ | September 15, 2006 | BRIAN JOSEPH

Posted on 09/15/2006 5:27:23 PM PDT by kellynla

SACRAMENTO – Californians who want to talk on the phone while driving will have to invest in a hands-free headset or use speaker phones under a new law signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger this morning.

The law, which will take effect in July 2008, prohibits motorists from holding a cell phone while driving. It establishes fines and requires motorists to use hands-free technology, such as Bluetooth or an earplug.

The law is intended to cut down on traffic accidents. Hand-held cell phones contributed to six fatal accidents in the state last year, according to the California Highway Patrol.

For Californians, this could have more effect on their lives than any other new piece of legislation signed this year. Similar laws are in place in Connecticut, New Jersey and New York.

"The simple fact is, it's dangerous to talk on your cell phone while driving," Schwarzenegger said in a statement. "CHP data show that cell phones are the No. 1 cause of distracted-driving accidents.

"So getting people's hands off their phones and onto their steering wheels is going to make a big difference in road safety."

If cited, motorists would get fined $20 for the first offense and $50 for subsequent ones. The citation would be an infraction, not a moving violation, which boosts insurance rates.

(Excerpt) Read more at ocregister.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: ca; cellphone; cellphonedriving; drivingwhiletalking; dwi; dwt; onehandonthewheel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 09/15/2006 5:27:24 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

ping


2 posted on 09/15/2006 5:27:53 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I drive everyday in Los Angeles from Orange County.

If they want to eliminate crashes, get the chicks to stop putting on their makeup while driving...somehow I don't think that one is going to be signed into law.


3 posted on 09/15/2006 5:29:30 PM PDT by Chicos_Bail_Bonds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
I guess insisting on a valid drivers license would be more unconstitutional than than this law.
4 posted on 09/15/2006 5:30:36 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
What's next?

Penis Pump Driver Crashes into Bus

5 posted on 09/15/2006 5:31:23 PM PDT by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I don't see much problem with using your cellphone while driving on straight, rural highways that are relatively uncrowded.

But 90% of the really bad driving I see here in the city seems to be someone with a cellphone to their ear. Driving in the city is a two-handed job, at least in mine.


6 posted on 09/15/2006 5:31:33 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Stupid law.
"Contributed" to 6 deaths out of probably 6-7000.
1/10 of 1%
And all the studies I have seen indicate that it is the distraction of the conversation itself that causes the lack of attention that cause the accident,not the physical act of holding the phone, so it does not even attack the root cause of the accident. In fact it may cause more by making it more convenient for people to talk while driving.
7 posted on 09/15/2006 5:32:50 PM PDT by calljack (Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chicos_Bail_Bonds

My biggest diversion is my charming children when they are in wonderful moods and screaming at each other.

Heck, even when they are in good moods, they start with the 20 question thing and it can be very distracting. "Mom, why is the car in front of us have an X in the license plate? Mom, what's the 2+5+8+7+3+4+2+16+8+...?, etc"

Oh well, that's why we got a DVD player for the car. It keeps them from distracting me.


8 posted on 09/15/2006 5:32:58 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
But 90% of the really bad driving I see here in the city seems to be someone with a cellphone to their ear. Driving in the city is a two-handed job, at least in mine.

Be ready for self-important "I am such a good driver that it doesn't matter if I use a cell phone and my silly little phone call IS more important than your life" types to come and bash you.

9 posted on 09/15/2006 5:35:01 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The state board will meet in closed session to discuss whether it violated an open meetings law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chicos_Bail_Bonds

Stand on a street corner all day and tell me which violation you see more of.

Women are going to be more prone to be the violators of farding (which cuts out 50% of the drivers, unlike cellphones). Women are going to be applying makeup more in morning and evening drives (when they've already showered and are touching up). Cellphone drivers are on the blasted things morning noon and night.

Who has their hand completely tied up for a longer period of time?

There is NO doubt that a cellphone driver is impaired. I am surprised there is even an exception for "headphones" when for decades it was illegal for the driver to wear headphones.


10 posted on 09/15/2006 5:35:24 PM PDT by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom

Yes, I encounter the same thing with my kids...just got back from a 3000 mile drive with the two kids in the back and my wife and I up front.

Some of those miles were awfully long. Of course if they got too out of hand, their momma set them straight and all was peaceful again.

:)


11 posted on 09/15/2006 5:36:26 PM PDT by Chicos_Bail_Bonds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

What a jerk! Why not make it IMMEDIATE!

I am tired to people going from 70-55-65-70-50....

With Semis passing and no way around.....

2008....what a JERK!


12 posted on 09/15/2006 5:36:38 PM PDT by Prost1 (Fair and Unbiased as always!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot

Maybe he could luck out and get a penis pump judge.


13 posted on 09/15/2006 5:37:21 PM PDT by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"So getting people's hands off their phones and onto their steering wheels is going to make a big difference in road safety."

Another stupid nanny-state law. It has nothing to do with having your hands on the wheel! It has everything to do with idiots who can't walk and chew gum at the same time. There are already laws to cover people with unsafe driving habits. These same airheads will now go buy their hands-free device and be just as distracted as they were previously! In the meantime, those people who were not distracted drivers lose more freedom and have more rights taken away, unable to use a cell phone for a periodic call even if they are sitting in a traffic jam moving 2 mph (or not at all.)

14 posted on 09/15/2006 5:38:20 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Sorry...but when I have a cellphone to my ear I have another hand on the wheel and I'm LOOKING AT THE ROAD.

I see people putting their makeup using the mirror where they have both eyes looking into the mirror, one hand holding the makeup and another applying it.


15 posted on 09/15/2006 5:38:27 PM PDT by Chicos_Bail_Bonds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Some lady ran me off the road the other day while talking on a cell phone when driving. I had to turn into a brick wall to avoid her coming at me.

So, I have to pay $450 to repair my car and I have no clue who she was.

BUMPER STICKER: SHUT UP AND DRIVE

16 posted on 09/15/2006 5:38:34 PM PDT by AGreatPer (Boot Murtha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Maybe some people can use them and maintain full concentration on the road. But the drivers who I would have previously suspected of being drunk are instead holding a cell phone to their ear if I get a peek at them.

Maybe they ARE drunk and it's just a coincidence.


17 posted on 09/15/2006 5:39:33 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: calljack

"In fact it may cause more by making it more convenient for people to talk while driving."

Where they can have conversations like "some guy just cut me off" and "I'm just pulling out of the driveway" (then why didn't you call from home???).

At my office, I hear the dumbest cellphone calls in the elevator. It's a comfort device. The modern teddy bear.


18 posted on 09/15/2006 5:39:44 PM PDT by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Chicos_Bail_Bonds
somehow I don't think that one is going to be signed into law.

ummmm maybe you should look at the title of the thread :)
19 posted on 09/15/2006 5:39:56 PM PDT by MikefromOhio ("...America has confronted evil before, and we have defeated it...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I keep hearing that hands on cell phone talking is no worse than hands off cell phone talking (or, that the latter is no better, same thing).

The button pushing factor is my guess as to the reason why. Mashing phone numbers on a console mounted phone is not any more conducive to looking at the road and traffic than mashing the numbers on your handheld. Once talking, either mode is no better or worse than conversing with a passenger.


20 posted on 09/15/2006 5:40:45 PM PDT by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson