Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California to Ban Drivers From Holding Cell Phones($20 Fine?LOL)
Los Angeles Times ^ | 7:13 PM PDT, September 14, 2006 | Nancy Vogel

Posted on 09/14/2006 8:13:36 PM PDT by kellynla

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- California will become the fourth state to ban motorists from holding cell phones while driving, under legislation Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger announced he would sign into law Friday.

The governor's office said Thursday he would sign the bill in Oakland, ending a five-year campaign by Sen. Joe Simitian, D-Palo Alto. Under the new law, which does not take effect until July 2008, Californians risk a minimum $20 fine for driving while talking into a phone -- unless they are using a headset, speaker phone, ear bud or some other technology that frees both hands while they talk. Drivers in emergency situations would be exempt.

"Public safety is the governor's No. 1 priority," said Schwarzenegger spokeswoman Margita Thompson, "and this bill will make the streets and highways of California safer by ensuring that drivers have both hands available for driving."

The bill passed the Assembly and Senate in late August, with largely Democratic support and the votes of a few Republicans.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca; callegislation; cellphone; cellphones; sb1613
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 09/14/2006 8:13:38 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; NormsRevenge; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BurbankKarl

ping


2 posted on 09/14/2006 8:14:28 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Cell Phone Fascism - Liberals think we're too stupid to drive responsibly.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

3 posted on 09/14/2006 8:15:34 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

So when are we going to see him crack down on illegal drivers? How about people eating, talking, or doing any of the other things that lead to the other 93% of car accidents?


4 posted on 09/14/2006 8:15:43 PM PDT by Bogey78O (<thinking of new tagline>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

toldjaso


5 posted on 09/14/2006 8:16:22 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a drowning man needs an anvil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

For once something sensible coming from California. Idiots with cell phones glued to their ear are a major road hazard. I fail to understand who you would talk to for that long or what possibly they could be discussing.


6 posted on 09/14/2006 8:16:40 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Its silly. I haven't seen them outlaw Sex At Speed - yet.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

7 posted on 09/14/2006 8:17:32 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"Public safety is the governor's No. 1 priority," said Schwarzenegger spokeswoman Margita Thompson, "

Well then why doesn't he make us wear crash helmets and wrap ourselves in bubble packing before we get in the car?

8 posted on 09/14/2006 8:17:52 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a drowning man needs an anvil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Here in CA, we ban dangerous things from the bottom up. We might just get to illegal immigration etc. after playgrounds, but who knows.


9 posted on 09/14/2006 8:18:11 PM PDT by TeenagedConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Again, this is all sound and fury, signifying nothing.

By 2008, the telecommunications paradigm will shift again.


10 posted on 09/14/2006 8:19:13 PM PDT by Hilltop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

I need to hold the phone when I'm driving so I can listen to instructions while I'm restringing my tennis racket.


11 posted on 09/14/2006 8:20:20 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Peace begins in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

How is talking on a cell phone any more distracting than a car full of people?


12 posted on 09/14/2006 8:21:00 PM PDT by NautiNurse (Katherine Harris for U.S. Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
For once something sensible coming from California. Idiots with cell phones glued to their ear are a major road hazard. I fail to understand who you would talk to for that long or what possibly they could be discussing.

Well not the South Dakota livestock report. Did it occur to you that people in large cities lead busy lives? Did it occur to you that there are things that rank much more dangerous than cellphones in terms of causing accidents, like fiddling with the radio/CD or disciplining children? Shall we ban radios and kids in cars because you can't relate?

13 posted on 09/14/2006 8:22:01 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The California Republican Party needs Arnold the way a drowning man needs an anvil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
I for one feel safer driving on the road with someone on a cell phone than a blue-haired granny that is a danger period.

I was driving down the road the other day, a 4 laner, when I saw the green buick with the handicap tag from the mirror. Yes, it was a blue haired danger.

After the driver made a complete stop at a green light, she proceeded along at about 10 miles below the speed limit. Upon coming up on her right side, I kid you not, I saw a friggin' radar detector on the dash. After passing her by, I noticed in my rear view mirror that she made a lane change that was unsafe at best.

14 posted on 09/14/2006 8:22:06 PM PDT by The Iceman Cometh (Just another evil conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

I don't care a thing for the morons who swerve all over the road and can't keep consistent speed because of those phones, but I've had to use mine while driving due to being lost or trying to communicate pertinent information. That's where speaker phone comes in handy. They shouldn't have to ruin it for those of us who can drive responsibly and talk at the same time.


15 posted on 09/14/2006 8:22:16 PM PDT by Firefigher NC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Safety is so overrated. I get infuriated when liberals treat me like a child! I am not that stupid. That's the problem with liberalism... the arrogance and condescension just oozes through.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

16 posted on 09/14/2006 8:22:39 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
My son and I were talking about this today. Are they going to fine you if both hands aren't on the wheel? No eating. No drinking. No adjusting the AC or changing the radio station. Heck how will you turn lights or windshields on? I started to say forget about blinkers but we don't use those things much anymore. Oh well... at least we won't have to put up with saluters and horn honkers
17 posted on 09/14/2006 8:25:50 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Firefigher NC

It's simple. There's a law in almost all states that driving in an unsafe manner is a ticketable offense. Just enforce it. But no. It's so much easier for cops to just nail people this way.

And at 20$ a pop this will make California tens of millions of dollars a year in revenue. But I'm sure it'l probably stop a few hundred wrecks from occuring.


18 posted on 09/14/2006 8:26:18 PM PDT by Bogey78O (<thinking of new tagline>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
How is talking on a cell phone any more distracting than a car full of people?

Guess you've never seen the Soccer Mom in the Suburban weave from lane to lane while yacking on her phone with one hand and hitting her kids in the back seat with the other.

19 posted on 09/14/2006 8:26:21 PM PDT by Hannibal Hamlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I think the CHP and all the other California PD's should set the example and remove the "push-to-talk" microphones from their radios. Or, ban them from holding the microphone while they're chasing cell phone violators. No talking on the radio during pursuits Trooper Dude! (:^*)


20 posted on 09/14/2006 8:26:40 PM PDT by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson