There was nothing to address in your first post. First it postulates the existence of a group that does not really exist here so the question cannot be answered. Secondly it does not speak about anything. Thirdly even if you let your imagination go heywire and you pretend there was actually something of substance there it is too contradictory to even reply to. There is no "Party" position here to defend or attack. Or are you under the misimpression that this Representative speaks for the Party? She does not.
Since you THINK there was some substance in that post why don't you let us all know what it was?
Sure there was. There is an ongoing debate here on FR that presupposes that merely having an "R" next to a candidates name should be enough for the voting masses. That actually standing for the basic Republican principles is meaningless.
Folks apparently like you since your first post on this thread was a DIRECT insult aimed at me.
As for this Rep's position, it defies logic that the Intel agencies could only surveil suspect terror groups AFTER they are suspected of an attack on US soil. The whole idea is utterly ridiculous.
Care to comment on that? Or will you just insult me some more?