Sure there was. There is an ongoing debate here on FR that presupposes that merely having an "R" next to a candidates name should be enough for the voting masses. That actually standing for the basic Republican principles is meaningless.
Folks apparently like you since your first post on this thread was a DIRECT insult aimed at me.
As for this Rep's position, it defies logic that the Intel agencies could only surveil suspect terror groups AFTER they are suspected of an attack on US soil. The whole idea is utterly ridiculous.
Care to comment on that? Or will you just insult me some more?
Of course, it is ridiculous and it will go nowhere.
I hate to think of what propositions would have come out of her RAT opponent's brain. It is almost certain to be even WORSE.
Who has denied the existence of GOP stupidity? The problem is the Party of Treason stupidity is MUCH worse.
Is there one RAT you would put ANY faith in to do what was right?