Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why British cellists may no longer fly to New York
Christian Science Monitor ^ | 09/12/06

Posted on 09/13/2006 9:57:26 AM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

1 posted on 09/13/2006 9:57:27 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What is this...about .0000001% of the population?!?!?!


2 posted on 09/13/2006 9:59:20 AM PDT by frogjerk (REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Pathetic. In their rush to show us that thay're actually Doing Something, they reveal only their own incompetence.

More money down the drain.


3 posted on 09/13/2006 9:59:27 AM PDT by highball (Proud to announce the birth of little Highball, Junior - Feb. 7, 2006!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Anyone remember the flight with the Syrian "musicians" that was described here in an article sometime last year?


4 posted on 09/13/2006 9:59:43 AM PDT by thoughtomator ("Martyr" - Arabic for "cannon fodder")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Nothing larger than a laptop bag can be carried into airplane cabins.

Does this mean no more small backpacks? For short overseas trips, I only pack a few changes of clothes in a backpack and avoid the hassle of large luggage. Or is this specific to UK travel only?
5 posted on 09/13/2006 10:00:20 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I ship very expensive scientific gear from time to time, often one-of-a-kind items with delicate parts. These musicians should invest in a finite-cost shipping container to transport their infinite-cost instruments. Then the instrument may even withstand a bad landing or heavy turbulence that may get it damaged, even strapped into the seat next to the musician. Then, the next generation would get to play the irreplaceable instrument.

We are at war.
6 posted on 09/13/2006 10:02:09 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"The idea that some bloke with a cello is a terrorist is laughable. Any terrorist would be more subtle than that," he says.

Sorry, chap. We can't be accused of profiling now can we? You'll have to give up your international career in order to preserve the appearance of PC.

7 posted on 09/13/2006 10:02:41 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

There is an option called charter your own aircraft. Might be a great tax deduction.


8 posted on 09/13/2006 10:03:01 AM PDT by mosaicwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

This actually happened to me right after 9/11. I was flying to Asia and was were not allowed a carry-on. The plane had to divert to San Fran. We were given free hotel rooms, and a toiletries kit but not our luggage. The kit had a box of Woolite, and we were expected to wash and air-dry our socks and underwear in preperation for the following morning's 12 hour flight.


9 posted on 09/13/2006 10:03:12 AM PDT by presidio9 (“The term ‘civilians’ does not exist in Islamic religious law.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Kirshbaum says that the restrictions are not so much about enhanced security as about ensuring that staff are not overwhelmed by passengers with awkward baggage. "I was told it was not specifically a security issue; it was an issue of the volume of work that was put on the people manning the machines in the central search area. They were trying to minimize that."

But if the musicians are willing to buy a ticket just for the instrument, then they're entitled to two passengers worth of screening time without imposing any extra workload on the screeners. Any less than two passengers worth and this issue is actually saving the screeners workload.

10 posted on 09/13/2006 10:04:17 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

My first thought was "can't we just make an exception for these guys?" But what happens when the guy carrying the cello is wearing a turban and has shaved off all his body hair?


11 posted on 09/13/2006 10:04:58 AM PDT by presidio9 (“The term ‘civilians’ does not exist in Islamic religious law.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

I think they actually were musicians.........


12 posted on 09/13/2006 10:05:26 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
[Instruments are] much less dangerous than laptops and duty-free bottles of highly flammable liquids [such as liquor and perfume]

Liquor isn't flammable unless over 100 proof. In fact that's where the "proof" system came from.

13 posted on 09/13/2006 10:06:37 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I would wager that American cellists will suffice.


14 posted on 09/13/2006 10:07:03 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Somebody get me a violin.


15 posted on 09/13/2006 10:07:32 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"The idea that some bloke with a cello is a terrorist is laughable."

And Chicago mobsters carried their Thompsons in a what? I'm sure that a terrorist, learning that a large object like a cello or French horn may be carried on a plane, would not think of a way to exploit that. Until we get the technology to reliably screen out questionable material we'll have to put up with forcing some people to change their habits and look ahead. I have never been on a plane with a cello. I've seen guitar cases, but no cello, oboe, bassoon, viola cases, or basses either.

16 posted on 09/13/2006 10:07:59 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

"May" implies permission.

These people do not WANT to fly to the USA if their instruments must be stowed.

It is their choice.


17 posted on 09/13/2006 10:07:59 AM PDT by TimesDomain (www.timerealms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

So far it's UK. I flew back to the States from Copenhagen a few weeks ago, about two weeks after the flurry at Heathrow, and we were able to keep our carry-on bags - just without liquids or gels. So it doesn't seem to be the rule in the rest of Europe.


18 posted on 09/13/2006 10:08:52 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

THANK you for posting this. My son is going to Italy and Austria next year to play in a string orchestra and he has to carry his violin. This has not been brought up at any of the parent meetings so I will bring this up at once.

Thanks again for the information.


19 posted on 09/13/2006 10:09:10 AM PDT by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Classical music ping.


20 posted on 09/13/2006 10:10:22 AM PDT by ecurbh (Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson