Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: rightgrafix
How about an illegals rally?
2 posted on
09/13/2006 6:44:05 AM PDT by
misterrob
To: rightgrafix
I agree. Test 'em on Congress critters.
To: rightgrafix
"(Because) if I hit somebody with a nonlethal weapon and they claim that it injured them in a way that was not intended, I think that I would be vilified in the world press." Well now, we can't have that, now can we? My self-image might be bruised!
The insanity continues...
4 posted on
09/13/2006 6:44:39 AM PDT by
liberty_lvr
(Those who stand for nothing fall for anything.)
To: rightgrafix
5 posted on
09/13/2006 6:44:45 AM PDT by
NaughtiusMaximus
(If DemonRATS are elected they are going to kill Christmas.)
To: rightgrafix
6 posted on
09/13/2006 6:45:01 AM PDT by
Toby06
To: rightgrafix
7 posted on
09/13/2006 6:45:49 AM PDT by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: rightgrafix
""(Because) if I hit somebody with a nonlethal weapon and they claim that it injured them in a way that was not intended, I think that I would be vilified in the world press."
Um..like killing a girl after shooting her in the eye with a pepperball?
To: rightgrafix
"If we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation."
W...T...F?
To: rightgrafix; wagglebee; neverdem
Domestic use would make it easier to avoid questions in the international community over any possible safety concerns, said Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne. "If we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation," said Wynne.
I'm just speechless.
13 posted on
09/13/2006 6:50:01 AM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: rightgrafix
Non-lethal weapons may be seductive sirens for liberals, but I can't help but remember Marlon Brando's warning from
Apocalypse Now, "The horror... the horror..."
It's not the weapon, it's the effect on survivors.
To: rightgrafix
""If we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation," said Wynne.
"
Perhaps Wynne would like to volunteer for this testing.
15 posted on
09/13/2006 6:50:42 AM PDT by
MineralMan
(Non-evangelical Atheist)
To: rightgrafix
Air America was going berserk over this tidbit this morning.
I have to say that I agree with the Secretary. We want to say that these are non-lethal weapons -- but we're afraid to use them on our own people because someone might die?
We should have enough courage to:
1) Use lethal methods in all appropriate situations
2) Call lethal methods what they are -- lethal methods
3) Use non-lethal methods in all appropriate situations
4) Use the term "non-lethal" only if we're convinced that they are.
16 posted on
09/13/2006 6:51:18 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
To: rightgrafix
"If we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation," said Wynne.Completely bass-ackwards!!!!
17 posted on
09/13/2006 6:51:22 AM PDT by
Niteranger68
(I gigged your peace frog.)
To: rightgrafix
This guy's an idiot and should be fired.
18 posted on
09/13/2006 6:52:10 AM PDT by
ksen
("For an omniscient and omnipotent God, there are no Plan B's" - Frumanchu)
To: rightgrafix
I say we test them out on Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne first.
Is this man completely insane?
To: rightgrafix
If he thinks this is such a good idea, he ought to be the first to volunteer.
20 posted on
09/13/2006 6:53:28 AM PDT by
ukie55
To: rightgrafix
Apparently this idiot thinks the police forces aren't militarized enough. Does she know the difference between "to serve and protect" and "to kill and destroy?"
23 posted on
09/13/2006 6:56:10 AM PDT by
coloradan
(Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
To: rightgrafix
The good general needs help.
![Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting](http://i112.photobucket.com/albums/n171/nyleather/crack-pipe.jpg)
24 posted on
09/13/2006 6:56:27 AM PDT by
NYleatherneck
(It ain't a World War until the French surrender.)
To: rightgrafix
Let me see if I have this straight... we should test weapons intended to be non-lethal on American citizens, for the purpose of determining whether or not they are, in fact, non-lethal. As opposed to testing them on, say, Al Qaeda fighters in Iraq, whom we would be otherwise killing anyway?
WTF?!
To: rightgrafix
So this jackboot would rather test them on his fellow citizens than the Islamofacists overseas...very telling.
28 posted on
09/13/2006 6:57:18 AM PDT by
Xenophon450
("Study the past, if you would divine the future." - Confucius)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson