Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This needs to be brought back into play. The 14th Amendment reads:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

When an illegal alien comes to this country they are not "subject to the jurisdiction therof" so their children born in the US are not citizens. They have no rights and should be deported with the parents and not become anchors for that illegal and their families.

1 posted on 09/12/2006 5:48:01 AM PDT by upier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: upier
GOP House leaders did not let the proposal come to a vote.

Hopefully, said leaders will be unemployed soon. Free up a job for a Republican.
2 posted on 09/12/2006 5:51:47 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upier
IANAL, but illegal aliens are certainly 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States -- they're neither foreign diplomats (who possess diplomatic immunity) nor other 'immune' classes. If they weren't 'subject' you couldn't detain them or charge them with crimes - like illegal immigration, for example, surely?

And their children born here are born citizens - that's some heavy stare decisis to overturn.

I have no idea how any of the existing SCOTUS Justices would feel about a law that was on its face in contravention of the 14th Amendment and case law. I seriously doubt it would pass muster.

You'd have to pass a Constitutional amendement, I suspect. Good luck on that.

--R.

3 posted on 09/12/2006 5:59:47 AM PDT by RustMartialis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upier

Well-to-do Koreans visit family or friends in LA in month eight of a pregnancy and stay long enough to give birth so that the child will be American and can then avoid compulsory ROK military service later on.


4 posted on 09/12/2006 6:06:25 AM PDT by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upier

Remember the 1996 immigration reform did away with anchor babies. Now if a "us citizen baby" is born to an illegal, the minor returns with the illegal when deported.

Additionally the citizenship of the minor may NOT be used to stay.

Of course immigration lawyers AND PARTICULARLY NON-LAWYERS WHO ARE ALLOWED TO PRACTICE BEFORE INS, have tried to game the system and claim the child has a "special need" to stay in the USA. (ADD, ADHD, illness, learning disability etc.) This is to accelerate the 10 year hardship visa requirment. (currently you hide the USA for 10 years and stay out of trouble and you get a hardship visa upon certain proofs.)

For those who don't know, ANYONE can play lawyer infront of the immigration service if you are accepted upon demonstrating knowledge. Thus even a paralegal can represent third parties without being a lawyer. This is how the left wing charities are able to represent illegals.


8 posted on 09/12/2006 6:38:05 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upier

This should be back-dated about 30 years.

Revoke teh citizenship of all anchor babies after 1076.


11 posted on 09/12/2006 7:18:20 AM PDT by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upier
When an illegal alien comes to this country they are not "subject to the jurisdiction therof" so their children born in the US are not citizens.

I couldn't agree more. Although, this article is old - December 27, 2005.
14 posted on 09/12/2006 9:59:26 AM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upier
"Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

Congress has more constitutional power granted it to restrict birthright citizenship than it does to infringe on the First and Second Amendment rights, which it often does so with impunity.

17 posted on 09/12/2006 10:08:18 AM PDT by azhenfud (He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: upier

This issue should have top priority.


22 posted on 09/12/2006 12:58:45 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson