Posted on 09/11/2006 4:06:56 AM PDT by shrinkermd
Media: In Orwellian fashion, ABC has edited its 9-11 miniseries to please the Clintonistas on whose watch the al-Qaida threat mushroomed. Perhaps, as someone once said, history is indeed a lie agreed upon.
In Friday’s Washington Post, an ABC executive who for some reason chose to be anonymous confirmed that “adjustments and refinements” have been made to its TV movie “The Path to 9/11,” and that the changes were based on objections by members of the Clinton administration and Bill Clinton himself.
The Post said the changes were “intended to make clearer that it was general indecisiveness” by Clinton officials that left America vulnerable to attack, “not any one individual.” Just which part of “commander in chief” does ABC not understand?
(Excerpt) Read more at epaper.investors.com ...
Well, it must have been the co-President then. Boy, what a twofer bargain that was.
Democrats didn’t whine about distortions and “fabrications” when Moore’s “Fahrenheit 9/11” came out.
Exactly! Let's hope the voters see them for the hypocrites they are and keep them out of power.
“intended to make clearer that it was general indecisiveness”
They didn't look 'indecisive' to me. Their objective was to not rock the boat. Clintoon's presumed legecy as America's greatest president, was to be left intact.
herr goebbles would be proud of these democrats. (they are much better than
he was)
No, not really.
You can give a Pig a bath, but he is still a Pig.
No amount of perfume will make the Clintons smell good.
Clinton was right, any docudrama of his Admin will have to be pulled of the air to keep the stench away.
True enough. But what Goebbels did simply isn't comparable to this. It just isn't and it is innapropriate to do so.
When the RATS might do given enough power is another story, but a comparison to Goebbels hit Godwin's law and therefore the individual who posted it forfeits the argument.
tyranny never dies. it is always attempting to insert its' head into the tent.
recognition of the countenance staring one in the face is not always a forfeit,
as per godwin's law, but it could be a refusal to forget history and see it
repeated. (what if one had said "the censors at pravda would have been proud"? )
l
It has been five years since 9/11 and the truth is beginning to come out about Clinton and his administration of cowards and traitors. Admittedly, that truth has been under serious fire from the Clinton/Stalinists, but some little bits of it have seeped out. Roll the calendar forward some five more years or even ten years, and a lot more of the truth will surface. Historians will have the records and will know the truth.
Not if Sandy Berger has his way. It makes one wonder what he took and what he placed in the files. The Clintonistas are busy revising history and will continue to do so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.