Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al Gore Says He Hasn't Ruled Out 2nd Run
NY Times ^ | September 10, 2006 | Associated Press

Posted on 09/10/2006 8:04:38 AM PDT by nj26

Former Vice President Al Gore said Sunday he hadn't rule out making a second bid for the White House, though he said it was unlikely.

Gore spoke to reporters in Sydney, where he was promoting the local premiere of his documentary on global warming.

''I haven't completely ruled out running for president again in the future but I don't expect to,'' Gore said before the Sunday night premiere of ''An Inconvenient Truth.''

''I offer the explanation not as an effort to be coy or clever. It's just the internal shifting of gears after being in politics almost 30 years. I hate to grind the gears,'' he added.

Gore, who lost the presidency to President Bush in 2000 in disputed circumstances, said there was no doubt the impact of global warming would be best addressed through the power of the presidency, but making a documentary was second best.

Gore's renewed popularity and movie tours across the United States have spurred speculation of a White House run in 2008. He has previously repeatedly denied such intentions.

The documentary, which Gore narrates, is critical of the United States and Australia for refusing to adopt the Kyoto Protocol for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Prime Minister John Howard, a friend and ally of Bush, said he would not meet Gore during his Australian visit and would not heed his advice to sign up to Kyoto.

''I don't take policy advice from films,'' Howard told reporters.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gore2008; manbearpig
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 last
To: nj26

Since algore has only "run" once, does this mean he's definitely running this time, and has already conceeded defeat? Wise move.


41 posted on 09/11/2006 6:50:29 AM PDT by presidio9 (“The term ‘civilians’ does not exist in Islamic religious law.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson