[unspun]

Fairly surprised this got through Reuters' filters. Just another bit of evidence of the plain truth that men should be on the front lines of battle, while women should be the ones they are fighting for.

[GoLightly]

Related story...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1698200/posts

and here

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1697991/posts

[ansel12]

"Fairly surprised this got through Reuters' filters. Just another bit of evidence of the plain truth that men should be on the front lines of battle, while women should be the ones they are fighting for."



It isn't a matter of what should be, it is a matter of what is.

Only a powerful government can enforce an unnatural order.

As far as women go, biker women are the toughest women around, now go into a biker bar, the women aren't dominate at all, as long as there are no armed men, or lawsuits to enforce artificial behavior, nature is displayed and in the natural world, men impose whatever order the have decided on.

[ECM]

Um, duh?

[SkyPilot]

[sgtbono2002]

Before guns were invited there was no question of which gender was the warrior. Superior strength was needed to weild weapons like swords and longbows. Todays weapons have convineced some that women should be in combat because either can pull a trigger. However there are many times when a soldier must rely on strength in battle and he doesnt need to be worried about protecting the female placed there with him. Nor does he need the added pressure of waking up in the morning with a priapism and a desire to use it. You cannot place normal male and female together and not expect fornication. It isnt natural.

[TalBlack]

This article is dumping a lot of things in one basket. Males and females are complimentary halves of a whole.

I believe there are situations in which the interest in aggression is different.

I have long suspected that if America had been an all male(whores aside) enterprise of the Crown the guys would have looked after their own interests in certain ways but never would have gone after the king. I think the American revolution was initially fomented by someone other than the guys but that the contribution was, by nature, invisible.



Males interact with one another in a way that forces a hierarchy of competence. This is the main(but not only)reason that men are warriors. Introduce a woman(however willing she may be) to the group and it no longer can interact as previously. Thus it is feminized.

[Recovering Hermit]

I basically learned the same thing in grade school.

[Leftism is Mentally Deranged]

Duh. This is news? Thanks to PC overwhelming "free speech" in this country, obvious facts have to be presented in the context of a study.
Damned be PC!

[WV Mountain Mama]

I would think this would fall under the "no $hit Sherlock" category. Now, anyone mess with my family, especially my children, and watch me turn on the mama warrior effect. :)

[Leftism is Mentally Deranged]

The "study" is a typical popular psychology "study" in which an experiment is done with a few college students, numbers are collected and a conclusion is drawn, to great fanfare, which has nothing to do with the silly-ass experiment.
The conclusion is valid, but the means of producing it is ridiculous.

[Hebrews 11:6]

Men compete

Women relate

[omega4179]

I think this explains the liberal male.