What did I 'interpret'?
>What about the 'supposed' miracles performed by Jesus?
That's for someone else to care about, not me. Not interested.
>What did I 'interpret'?
By quoting the Bible, you have 'interpreted' that it is a valid means by which to discuss the existence of God. I reject this. Do I have to be any more blunt, or can we, as I have requested, leave it at that? There is nothing in that book that has any bearing on my Faith, and I see no productive reason to continue this line of discussion. If there is or was a Jesus, if he performed miracles or not, means nothing to me. My own feelings, belief, thoughts, and opinions on God are all I consider relevant, and since others sharing theirs with me is typically wasteful (and often obnoxious), my tendency is to keep it to myself. If that's wrong in the eyes of God, that's between him & me, not anyone else.
If you can't accept that my faith & belief doesn't hinge on Jesus, miracles, the Bible, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, then you're just going to have to get over it. And if this means I'm doomed to Hell, then that's my problem, not yours. If you're determined to discuss miracles, Jesus, & Scripture, take it up with someone who cares.