Skip to comments.
In New Letter, Clinton's Lawyers Demands ABC Yank Film
tpm cafe ^
| 9/9/06
| Greg Sargent
Posted on 09/09/2006 9:03:27 AM PDT by finnman69
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 401-405 next last
To: finnman69
Here's an idea, let's let BJ and the gang tell the true story about how Osama was not killed, captured, or incarcerated, when they had so many chances. Watch them eat their own. We can turn it into a Docu-comedy.
To: finnman69
Are we sure this letter is real? There are a few spelling errors in it, which would make it suspect. Also, this is from some guy's blog, so we would need other verification of it. I dislike Clinton as much as the next Freeper, but this is starting to remind me of the "purple rage" nonsense.
To: Peach
And also I thought people were given the full DVD and so if Clinton wanted to watch it, he could. Unless BenVenista denied letting Clinton see his copy .. yes he could have watched it
Hundreds of people received this DVD .. and no offered to show it to Clinton???
I find that to be completely BS
63
posted on
09/09/2006 9:23:05 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Think about it .. A Speaker Nancy Pelosi could be 2 seats away from being President)
To: finnman69
We've obtained a copy of the letter, and it reads in partCool. There's a leaker at ABC.
64
posted on
09/09/2006 9:23:06 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
(A pirate's life for me.)
To: Rex Anderson
Did Caligula say that with a straight face, about telling the truth?
65
posted on
09/09/2006 9:23:27 AM PDT
by
scott7278
(The War on Terror includes defending the homefront from the MSM.)
To: bybybill
Irresponsible is a liberals middle name and of course this and other situations are in the name of "compassion". Mourn the families but don't look at who allowed this to happen.
66
posted on
09/09/2006 9:23:43 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: TomGuy
This movie may smear her co-presidency 1992-2000. If they can stop it, they can preserve the Clintonian version of history. And they can aim at potential future obstacles in her path to the WH in 08. If they can't stop it, it could taint her presidential aspirations.
Of course, the question obsessing everyone today is: Does the movie misrepresent events, conversations and policies of the Clinton administration?
67
posted on
09/09/2006 9:24:18 AM PDT
by
Wolverine
(A Concerned Citizen)
To: sandra_789
I heard the film will show first act of terrorism under the Clinton watch.
There is a scene where Hillary hits the presidents head with an ashtray, and the secret service are hesitant to respond.
This is first incicdent where we failed to respond to an act of terror. Bin Laden heard about this, and then started his Jihad.
She should have been tackeld and hog tied. Then sent to Gitmo, and prosecuted for assault.
68
posted on
09/09/2006 9:24:22 AM PDT
by
PA-RIVER
To: finnman69
Be careful...ABC has already said it was still editing...the Clinton lawyers probably know what cuts were made and Clinton might even look good at the end...this could be a classic mis-direction...remember Brer Rabbitt.
69
posted on
09/09/2006 9:24:32 AM PDT
by
MarkT
To: Mo1
I find that difficult to believe too, Mo1.
What is really surprising to me is that religious leaders requested that the producer of The Da Vinci Code put a disclaimer at the beginning of the film (which they refused to do) and when the MSM heard about the request(s), they went ballistic calling it censureship.
But not a PEEP out of the strong-arm tactics by The Mob, formerly known as the Clinton administration.
70
posted on
09/09/2006 9:25:06 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: Peach
I thought I heard Kean on television say that the movie was faithful to the 9/11 Commission Report and any changes he suggested were made? I believe it, since baldfaced lying is part of the Clinton playbook...In fact, it's their first principle of engagement.
71
posted on
09/09/2006 9:25:32 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
(A pirate's life for me.)
To: finnman69
Democrats' opinions, much the same as the Soviet Communists' opinions, are mostly deliberate lies. Their aim is to disrupt consensus government via class warfare and confusion among the voting public.
To: finnman69
Iger might find himself on a one-way ride to Ft. Marcy Park with John Palomino and Ray 'Buddy' Young.
73
posted on
09/09/2006 9:26:40 AM PDT
by
johnny7
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
To: My2Cents
Hehehehe. My first really good laugh of the morning.
74
posted on
09/09/2006 9:27:12 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: finnman69
Pull it and replace it with the Best Of Leterman - the Monica jokes.
75
posted on
09/09/2006 9:27:40 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: Laverne
I don't know if CBS has the guts to run this as is.
You know, demoncrats will just deny any smidgen of truth that emerges that shows them to be lying, incompetent, cold hearted, self servicing cretins that they are.
76
posted on
09/09/2006 9:28:06 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: finnman69
"Congress (Clinton, Democrats) shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;"
77
posted on
09/09/2006 9:28:08 AM PDT
by
FreeRep
To: finnman69
ABC won't pull the film, and I doubt they've made significant edits. But what all this bellyaching by Clinton's team has done is to prepare the viewing public to now question everything they see in the film. Anything negative about Clinton's non-response to terrorism will be received with, "Well, we're told this is all fiction."
78
posted on
09/09/2006 9:28:24 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
(A pirate's life for me.)
To: Laverne
and ABC hasn't even reported the threatening letter they received; not on their web site, not on the air. Amazing. With all this going on right in front of the public, just imagine what's going on in private. I imagine Xlinton's demons have been working overtime, digging up dirt on ABC executives and producers, looking to destroy marriages and careers if he doesn't get his way. He is obviously very desperate to keep this off the air. What does a Clinton fear more than truth? And, to what lengths will they go to squelch the truth?
79
posted on
09/09/2006 9:28:29 AM PDT
by
FlyVet
To: hipaatwo
The Dems dish it out but never can take it. The media are only too willing to help them out.
80
posted on
09/09/2006 9:28:31 AM PDT
by
oyez
(The way to punish a providence is to allow it to be governed by philosophers. --Frederick the Great)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 401-405 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson