Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court shoots down U. gun ban [University of Utah]
Salt Lake Tribune ^ | 9/9/2006 | Pamela Manson and Sheena McFarland

Posted on 09/09/2006 6:28:47 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 09/09/2006 6:28:48 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

So the University of Utah is a state entity?


2 posted on 09/09/2006 6:34:15 AM PDT by Gondring (If "Conservatives" now want to "conserve" our Constitution away, then I must be a Preservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

It is to the best of my knowledge.


3 posted on 09/09/2006 6:40:41 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("A litany of complaints is not a plan." - GW Bush, referring to DNC's lack of a platform on ANYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Supported through the State Income Tax.

Don't let Utah's Red State election characteristic fool you. Salt Lake City has a high abundance of left wing whackjobs. Heck, the mayor (the loon Rocky Anderson) was an ACLU lawyer. Gay rights for city employees, etc, ad nauseam. The Uof U is run by loonies just like any modern University.


4 posted on 09/09/2006 6:42:42 AM PDT by Seruzawa (If you agree with the French raise your hand - If you are French raise both hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
The U., while acknowledging that the Legislature has general control and budgetary supervision over the school, insisted that it is an autonomous entity that can disregard a law that interferes with internal academic affairs.

So defending yourself interferes with academic affairs? Typical communism: shut up and take your beating quietly. When somebody comes to kill you, you're supposed to just lie in the ditch and be quiet.

5 posted on 09/09/2006 6:43:10 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("A litany of complaints is not a plan." - GW Bush, referring to DNC's lack of a platform on ANYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
"It scares the hell out of me," said Smith, a senior in communication. "I don't want some cowboy coming to class with a gun."

If they are a mind to, they probably have been all along. Laws and rules, especially the malum prohibitum type, only affect those who choose to obey them.

6 posted on 09/09/2006 6:46:25 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Under the majority analysis, she said, "the university may not subject a student to academic discipline for flashing his pistol to a professor in class."

How disingenuous-- a straw man argument. Brandishing to threaten or frighten is not supported by the licensing authorities anywhere.

7 posted on 09/09/2006 6:47:22 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really needed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
"It scares the hell out of me," said Smith, a senior in communication. "I don't want some cowboy coming to class with a gun."

Yep, we're all safer if we're helpless. Typical leftist moron.

8 posted on 09/09/2006 6:50:18 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("A litany of complaints is not a plan." - GW Bush, referring to DNC's lack of a platform on ANYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The U. is arguing that any interference with its gun policy violates its right to academic freedom guaranteed by the First and 14th amendments

???? The U is a subsidiary of the state, funded by the legislature thereof. It's not a person in any sense, and thus is not covered by either the 1st or 14th amendments. Not that I see anything about "academic freedom" in those amendments.

Of course there is something in the second amendment that applies to this case, but it applies to "the people", in this case some students, staff, faculty and visitors to the campus. Something about a "right to keep and bear arms.

There's similar provision in the Utah Constitution as well.

"The individual right of the people to keep and bear arms for security and defense of self, family, others, property, or the State as well as for other lawful purposes shall not be infringed; but nothing herein shall prevent the legislature from defining the lawful use of arms." Article 1, Section 6.

9 posted on 09/09/2006 6:51:55 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Court shoots down U. gun ban [University of Utah]

Don't ya just love headline writers. They could have said the court axed the ban, threw out the ban, or used any number of other terms. But they always have to get cute.

Bah Humbug.


10 posted on 09/09/2006 6:55:46 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Celebrate FREEDOM! Buy a Gun for 9/11 !!!


11 posted on 09/09/2006 7:02:27 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
The U is a subsidiary of the state, funded by the legislature thereof.

But they claim not to be subject to state law. By their "logic", they can legalize LSD and mushrooms since banning it would stifle academic freedom.

Liberalism kills academic freedom but the U administrators aren't trying to ban that!

12 posted on 09/09/2006 7:04:51 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("A litany of complaints is not a plan." - GW Bush, referring to DNC's lack of a platform on ANYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!
13 posted on 09/09/2006 7:09:41 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
My view is that university campuses (campi?) can be very dangerous places. Seems there are often predators about looking for a coed to rape. Being able to defend oneself against these bad guys should be unqestioned, IMHO.

Those wimpy girls quoted in the article---there's no hope for them to change their opinion any time soon. However, that shouldn't stop the rest of the women on campus from being able to protect themselves.


14 posted on 09/09/2006 7:21:06 AM PDT by basil (Exercise your Second Amendment Rights--buy another gun today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
but nothing herein shall prevent the legislature from defining the lawful use of arms." Article 1, Section 6.

I think that is where they think they get the power to ban guns on campus.

15 posted on 09/09/2006 7:23:38 AM PDT by looscnnn ("Olestra (Olean) applications causes memory leaks" PC Confusious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: basil

I guess these wimpy girls think having a cop on their cellphone is adequate protection if some nut wants to do something to them. Crazy, especially since Utah has had some really high-profile kidnappings and murders.


17 posted on 09/09/2006 7:30:02 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("A litany of complaints is not a plan." - GW Bush, referring to DNC's lack of a platform on ANYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
It scares the hell out of me," said Smith, a senior in communication. "I don't want some cowboy coming to class with a gun."

Shim, an undeclared freshman, said, "I don't feel a threat here now, but if there are concealed weapons around, I'd be afraid."

These are the best anti-gun students they could find. Bwahaha.

18 posted on 09/09/2006 7:33:28 AM PDT by varyouga (I no longer fear death. I only fear the day when the DUmmies take over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
What I never understood about leftists is how a 'cowboy' that wants to go in and shoot-up the school is going to be stopped by a gun ban in the school.

Banning guns in Columbine did not stop the massacre. The killers went around unchallenged and executed children while cops were figuring out what to do. Had some of the staff been armed, there would have been a different outcome.
19 posted on 09/09/2006 7:41:15 AM PDT by varyouga (I no longer fear death. I only fear the day when the DUmmies take over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Which part of "shall not be infringed" is difficult to understand...


20 posted on 09/09/2006 8:07:44 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson