Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Path To 9/11: Democratic Party = Soviet Politburo
netWMD - The War to Mobilize Democracy ^ | 9/8/06 | Andrew Jaffee

Posted on 09/08/2006 4:21:37 PM PDT by forty_years

Having traveled in the Soviet Union several times, I got used to reading the headlines in Pravda, Novosti, etc. The wording used by apparatchiks in those days of Stalinist repression are now being echoed by the Democratic National Committee on its website. The DNC is frothing at the mouth in the hopes of stifling freedom of expression -- a TV show, namely ABC's "The Path To 911." What's really frightening is that the Democratic Senate leadership has threatened to revoke ABC's broadcast license if it doesn't censor the 911 drama. Here is the DNC in its own words -- proving that the mini-series has hit too close to home:

A Despicable, Irresponsible Fraud
Does a major national broadcast network want to stain itself by presenting an irresponsible, slanderous, fraudulent, "docu-drama" to the American public? "The Path to 9/11" mocks the truth and dishonors the memory of 9/11 victims to serve a cheap, callous political agenda. Help keep this propaganda off the air. Read more...

"Keep "Path to 9/11" Propaganda Film Off The Air...

Keep a TV show off the air in the home of the free, land of the brave? And this is being advocated by a party that calls itself "democratic?" Here is the Democrats' not so veiled threat to ABC:

Presenting such deeply flawed and factually inaccurate misinformation to the American public and to children would be a gross miscarriage of your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, to your shareholders, and to the nation.

The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest. Nowhere is this public interest obligation more apparent than in the duty of broadcasters to serve the civic needs of a democracy by promoting an open and accurate discussion of political ideas and events.

Please help support free expression by asking ABC to go ahead with its docudrama.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; abc; broadcast; censor; democrats; leadership; letter; license; pathto911; politburo; pull; senate; soviet; sovietpolitburo; threat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Livfreeordi

Hows the stock been reacting to all of this?


21 posted on 09/08/2006 5:12:41 PM PDT by uptoolate (The U.N. will be the tool of the Anti-Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dacus943
Sent them one of these. I would like to see what all the noise is about on the showing of the 9/11 TV movie. I do not approve of censorship. I have been led to believe that parts will be taken out. I do not understand the reasoning as it is a docudrama. Show it as originally made and let the public and the press decide its merits. This is America, we the people should not be told what we are allowed to see or not to see. It appears you are being deprived of you're first amendment rights.
22 posted on 09/08/2006 5:16:22 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft ( The Demoncratic Party Battle Flag is Pure White! They stole it from the French..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: uptoolate

You think all the Democrats' whining hasn't actually INCREASED publicity and interest in the movie?

Yup.

and increased viewership = increased ratings..

Let's hope the moonbats are having another Wellstone moment and shooting themselves in the foot by increasing interest in the movie.


23 posted on 09/08/2006 5:18:29 PM PDT by Livfreeordi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Livfreeordi

I've gone after my Senators for all the good it's going to do. The question needs to be asked on the Senate floor if the five, Commie idiots that wrote the letter have stepped over the boundaries into Communism, Fascism and Nazism. I believe they have. Threats and intimidation is not "the American way." I've yet to see the Bush Administration threaten and intimidate anyone for a film or a book. Lord knows there is some real garbage out there. Beginning with Mikey "Cream Puff" Moore's fantasy and the BBC's Death of a President.


24 posted on 09/08/2006 5:22:13 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The "Peace sign" is the DemocRATS' last act of defiance before they cut 'n' run from the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: forty_years

What are the dems wanting edited out and why? That would be interesting to know.


25 posted on 09/08/2006 5:33:08 PM PDT by lmr (The answers to life don't involve complex solutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
The question needs to be asked on the Senate floor if the five, Commie idiots that wrote the letter have stepped over the boundaries into Communism, Fascism and Nazism. I believe they have. Threats and intimidation is not "the American way

Us discussing this amongst ourselves is pretty meaningless. The entire GOP needs to pounce on this attempt at government extortion being attempted by the Demoncrats and not only loudly condemn it in no uncertain terms but censure those Senators who orchestrated this extortion.

I'm not holding my breath.

26 posted on 09/08/2006 6:08:17 PM PDT by Conservative_Rob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Conservative_Rob

I know what you mean. We sit here screaming out lungs out and the GOP is up on the hill sitting on their thumbs. I guess they are afraid they might "offend" someone.


27 posted on 09/08/2006 6:11:21 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The "Peace sign" is the DemocRATS' last act of defiance before they cut 'n' run from the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft
Bringbackthedraft

Ouch! Friend, the hairs are standing up on the back of my neck on this one. Can't believe they actually floated that letter and it "leak" to the public. Looks like a direct threat to ABC!

Seems to me it high time the government got reminded that they should fear the people and not Vice Versa!

28 posted on 09/08/2006 6:16:14 PM PDT by Dacus943
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: forty_years

"...irresponsible, slanderous, fraudulent, "docu-drama"..."


Yet "Fahrenheit 9/11" was hailed as a "documentary" and the recipient of numerous awards at Cannes etc. by simpering liberals, despite misrepresentation and outright lies.

All those words are the hallmark of any Michael Moore production.

When the hypocrisy crosses the line into the ridiculous for no other reason than outright, indefensible partisanship, you know you are dealing with a group of people that could only be called ignorant if you were being charitable and practically evil if you were being fair and accurate.

If the sheer disproportionate response (to steal a favorite word from the Isreal haters) to this and the disgraceful treatment of President Bush's TANG record (and complete oversight of Kerry's mysterious record of cowardice and deceit) aren't enough to convince you that the Democrats are not the party you want running the country, than little else will.

In fact, this coordinated response by "concerned" Democrats is highly reminiscent of the response they had to the heroic Swiftboat vets and John O'Neil.

I think we need a new word to combine dispicable, seditious, hypocritical, self serving, anti-American and extreme leftist/socialist.

Oh wait! We have it: it is "Democrat" (emphasis on the "rat").


29 posted on 09/08/2006 6:31:55 PM PDT by SpinyNorman (The ACLU empowers terrorists and criminals, weakens America, and degrades our society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shankbear

I hope you and your scuzzy ilk are haunted til you die

Sorry to be the bearer of sad tidings, but you have to have a conscience to be 'haunted' and the Comrades Clinton do not have any consciences.


30 posted on 09/08/2006 6:43:12 PM PDT by hardworking (Comrade Clinton - protecting you from 'unapproved' information)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Livfreeordi

Great! Glad to know that you are among the stockholders.


31 posted on 09/08/2006 6:45:26 PM PDT by sgtyork (Prove to us that you can enforce the borders first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: npg
Could you imagine the outrage from the left if Karl Rove made the same demands of a television network?The democrats only care about accuracy in the media when it is a democrat being portrayed in a bad light.They were ecstatic over Michael Moron's distorted propaganda film because it attacked president Bush.
32 posted on 09/08/2006 7:00:02 PM PDT by peeps36 (Rebuild Iraq's Army And Send It Over To Kick Iran In The Teeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lmr
What are the dems wanting edited out and why? That would be interesting to know.

Mostly the parts they claim aren't backed by the 911 Commission Report.
33 posted on 09/08/2006 7:00:42 PM PDT by ew73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: forty_years

Well, I can't wait for the Democrat National Convention to be televised in 2008 so that we can call for the cancellation due to the democrats not sticking to the truthful facts and it's not right to televise left wing propaganda even though the democrats are best known for doing a lot of squealing vemon and bleeding heart drama.


34 posted on 09/08/2006 7:09:35 PM PDT by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forty_years
The Democrats are panicked... this election isn't catering to their core issues and on national security, they know its one debate they can't win. So they seek to have it squelched.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

35 posted on 09/08/2006 7:12:48 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forty_years
The DNC is asking people to send emails to friends to protest the ABC 9-11 program. I modified their message somewhat and sent the following:

Hey,

The ABC television network, owned by the Walt Disney Company, is airing a "docudrama" entitled "The Path to 9/11". It shows what a scumbag Bill Clinton really was and how 3000 Americans died because all he wanted was a B*** J** in the White house.

The Democrats are afraid of what you may think of them and the perverted political party they have become.

If you watch this show, they should be afraid.

Very afraid.
36 posted on 09/08/2006 7:14:07 PM PDT by Panzerlied ("We shall never surrender!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpinyNorman

Freedom.

Freedom of speech.

For years, I as a Christian man have had to sit by in humility why my Savior has been degraded, mocked, and ridiculed. In the so-called "art" form of mixing Jesus with urine, the portrayal of Him in the DaVinci Code and other depictions, the left has cried "Freedom of Speech!"

In my world we have a being who works, under the title of 'the god of this age', to see to it that the Christ is blasphemed. He is also know as 'the father of lies' and 'a murderer from the beginning'. He is also know for 'appearing as an angel of light'.

So you see when I see the left condemning the blasphemous art forms out there and in fact fighting for them to exist, and then now suppressing this 'art form' on the grounds of 'lack of truth', it's more than just blatant hypocrisy, more than just dispicable and seditious, self serving, and anti-American.

You wrote:

"I think we need a new word to combine dispicable, seditious, hypocritical, self serving, anti-American and extreme leftist/socialist."

I believe the word we are looking for is "pure evil".


37 posted on 09/08/2006 7:50:52 PM PDT by uptoolate (The U.N. will be the tool of the Anti-Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: forty_years
As I remember, Michael Moore was literally feted by the sitting leader of the Democrat Senate, Tom Daschle. "Fahrenheit 9/11" contained at least 59 deceits and outright lies... Clinton and his minions are complaining about 3 minutes out of 5 hours of carefully researched and documented entertainment film. Apparently it is "too sensitive" and not accurate enough to show before an election. "Fahrenheit 9/11" was shown before an election, and Bush won. So, what does Clinton have to worry about? Perhaps the truth means something to Clinton, as something to fear.
38 posted on 09/08/2006 8:14:30 PM PDT by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peeps36
Could you imagine the outrage from the left if Karl Rove made the same demands of a television network?The democrats only care about accuracy in the media when it is a democrat being portrayed in a bad light.They were ecstatic over Michael Moron's distorted propaganda film because it attacked president Bush.

...during a presidential campaign.

And I don't recall the President, nor members of the Republican majority in the House and Senate, threatening the movie industry as did the Stalincrats threaten ABC. There were rebuttals, sure, even from liberals, or people who weren't too wild about President Bush...but they were rebuttals from citizens, commentators, not from governmental officials.

And by the way, where does this end? If the CSG (Clinton Shadow Government) can say that what happened didn't happen, with regard to this, what else will they get away with? Or, perhaps more accurately, what will we allow them to get away with?

39 posted on 09/08/2006 11:43:09 PM PDT by Christian4Bush ("Ma'am, you don't have to thank us. You just go beat him for us." Soldier to Irey re: Murtha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
As I remember, Michael Moore was literally feted by the sitting leader of the Democrat Senate, Tom Daschle.

Not just him...leadership from both parties went to the premiere of F911.

"Fahrenheit 9/11" contained at least 59 deceits and outright lies... Clinton and his minions are complaining about 3 minutes out of 5 hours of carefully researched and documented entertainment film. Apparently it is "too sensitive" and not accurate enough to show before an election. "Fahrenheit 9/11" was shown before an election, and Bush won. So, what does Clinton have to worry about? Perhaps the truth means something to Clinton, as something to fear.

Here's the link to those 59 deceits. And the guy that compiled them, Dave Kopel, endorsed and voted for Ralph Nader in 2000. So no Bush apologist, he.

http://www.davekopel.com/Terror/Fiftysix-Deceits-in-Fahrenheit-911.htm

40 posted on 09/08/2006 11:51:32 PM PDT by Christian4Bush ("Ma'am, you don't have to thank us. You just go beat him for us." Soldier to Irey re: Murtha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson