To: BJClinton
What mistake did the bank make?
The bank should have known immediantly if the check was bad and refused deposit. Sounds like a lazy teller to me. Having one of their customers, who was basically an innocent party, arrested was their second mistake. Let me guess who got these no-liability laws passed?
48 posted on
09/08/2006 1:48:00 PM PDT by
wolfcreek
(You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
To: wolfcreek
The bank should have known immediantly if the check was bad and refused deposit.Sounds like a lazy teller to me.
Actually the teller did exactly what they should do, they verified the account and noticed the hold on the account, called the business and verified the check was not legit and then called the police. The police then arrested the person who presented the check as a suspect in alleged fraud. No laziness, no mistakes.
Let me guess who got these no-liability laws passed?
Obviously the financial institutions because they are easier to sue than the real fraudster that forged the check.
61 posted on
09/08/2006 2:45:05 PM PDT by
BJClinton
(What happens on Free Republic, stays on Google.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson