Posted on 09/08/2006 10:52:16 AM PDT by npg
PDF file, click link
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2006/images/09/07/berger.iger.pdf
I would never suggest that anyone call the Stonebridge number at the bottom of the page.
Why this man wasnt hung or publically ridiculed in the town square is beyond me. Washington would have frog marched him behind the barn the day after the pants stuffing felony.
Sandy stole a copy of the script???
thanks for posting that for me. I was having trouble.
"There is nothing in the 911 Commission Report (the purported basis of your film) to support this portrayal...."
Let me finish the sentence as it should be:.....
"because all the relevant evidence was either in my pants or my socks when I left the National Archives"
This video link from MSNBC shows how the Clintoons/Berger failed to stop Ben Laden and enabled him to kill 3000 Americans on 9/11.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JuH1xwLUnbg
His comments must be taken in that context. /s
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1177555/posts
Berger rejected four plans to kill or capture bin Laden
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^ | July 24, 2004 | James G. Lakely
Posted on 07/23/2004 11:12:30 PM PDT by neverdem
President Clinton's national security adviser, Samuel R. Berger, rejected four plans to kill or capture Osama bin Laden, worrying once that if the plans failed and al Qaeda launched a counterattack, "we're blamed."
According to the September 11 commission's 567-page report, released Thursday, Mr. Berger was told in June 1999 that U.S. intelligence agents were confident about bin Laden's presence in a terrorist training camp called Tarnak Farms in Afghanistan.
Mr. Berger's "hand-written notes on the meeting paper," the report says, showed that Mr. Berger was worried about injuring or killing civilians located near the camp.
Additionally, "If [bin Laden] responds" to the attack, "we're blamed," Mr. Berger wrote.
The report also says that Richard Clarke, Mr. Berger's expert on counterterrorism, presented that plan to get bin Laden because he was worried about the al Qaeda leader's "ambitions to acquire weapons of mass destruction."
These revelations come as Mr. Berger is under investigation by the Justice Department for smuggling several copies of classified documents that dealt with the Clinton administration's anti-terror policies out of the National Archives.
Commission Co-chairman Lee Hamilton said Thursday, however, that the missing documents Mr. Berger has acknowledged taking doesn't affect "the integrity" of the final report.
According to the report, the first plan of action against bin Laden presented to Mr. Berger was a briefing by CIA Director George J. Tenet on May 1, 1998. Mr. Berger took no action, the report says, because he was "focused most" on legal questions.
Why do people insist on using their business letterhead to write letters like this? To me that is the most unprofessional thing a person can do. You don't use your employer/business address to write personal letters on. I worked for the State of New York. If I'd used letterhead to write personal letters on, I'd have been brought up on charges. Why would you use a business letterhead if what you are writing about doesn't even pertain to the company's business? If Burglar wanted to write a letter to Disney, he should have used his own personal letterhead, or he could have at least use the back of the papers he pilfered from the Archives. What a pathetic loser.
probably because it says he's Chairman.
He may be a Chairman, but he's still wrong in using his business letterhead to write a letter pertaining to a personal issue. It's a gross misuse of that organization's name. It's as if he's speaking for the whole Stonebridge group...not just himself.
The guy is the laughingstock of the decade.
Notice how they somehow put patial blame on the military. The target is in sight, they request to fire. Get no response and somehow have to take the blame for not "requesting to fire" What? more loudly? What the hell is the military supposed to do?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.