Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats urge ABC to withdraw 9/11 movie
Reuters ^ | Richard Cowan and Thomas Ferraro

Posted on 09/07/2006 1:52:09 PM PDT by 300magnum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: shankbear

IF republicans were smart, they would make the censorship an issue. If the democrats do this to a network now, imagine what they will do if they control Congress or the White House! As I said, if the republicans were smart.


61 posted on 09/07/2006 2:12:50 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn

62 posted on 09/07/2006 2:14:19 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds. " - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I love this stuff....I probably wouldn't have watched the miniseries, but I sure as hell will now.


63 posted on 09/07/2006 2:14:21 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (Meep Meep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

They can alter all they want but the truth speaks beyond the twists of lies. We know your deceptions Klintoons.... you cannot hide or spin. We know more than you think or want us to. Truth will not stay suppressed forever.


64 posted on 09/07/2006 2:14:26 PM PDT by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: nina0113

"Public outcry did prevent the showing of the Brolin-as-Reagan miniseries, but I don't remember any Congressional involvement."

It did show, they just switched it from the alphabet channel to their cable channel. Don't remember which network that was. I think the big howl on that movie was that Reagan was portrayed by BS's husband, and that eroded confidence big time that it would be a fair portrayal of The Gipper.


65 posted on 09/07/2006 2:14:55 PM PDT by rightazrain (“Ceasefire” is just another word for “reload.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

The dems are really being stupid about this. If ABC pulls or edits this in a bald manner because the left applies lots of pressure, the Indie voters will pull right.



66 posted on 09/07/2006 2:15:23 PM PDT by OpusatFR ( ALEA IACTA EST. We have just crossed the Rubicon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum
IMO, ABC Entertainment is pretty bold for doing this at all. They spent $40 million making this film and I doubt they would have let it be released without checking it's authenticity and legal ramifications.
67 posted on 09/07/2006 2:15:35 PM PDT by wolfcreek (You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum; Sooth2222
As Sooth2222 said on another thread:

No, plus there are enough original copies around that everything that's cut will be replayed not just once, but 100 times on the news channels. (not to mention internet channels)

If they kill it, it's bad for the Dems, if they change it, it's bad for the Dems, and if they leave it alone, it's bad for the Dems.

It bears repeating, thanx Sooth. No matter what ABC does, if they even really edit it (which I honestly wonder if they are), the Dems come out stinking horribly.

Who's to say that ABC isn't just smoothing things over, all the while, planning on airing "as is"? Once it's out, it's out. And from the comments I've read from ABC, it seems they aren't editing much and IMO, they aren't really folding, if they are still airing it.
68 posted on 09/07/2006 2:16:54 PM PDT by Lucky9teen ( If you can't, you must. If you must, you can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


69 posted on 09/07/2006 2:17:04 PM PDT by yield 2 the right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: npg

"You can ignor reality, however you can not ignor the results."


70 posted on 09/07/2006 2:17:36 PM PDT by newcthem (Brought to you by the INFIDEL PARTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum
about eight months after Clinton turned over the presidency in January 2001 to Republican George W. Bush.

Am I splitting hairs here, or does this make Bubba sound like some kind of all-powerful dynast? Wasn't Bush elected by us?

71 posted on 09/07/2006 2:17:37 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

"Promotional DVDS were sent out... "

Rush claims he has a full unedited copy. On his sign-off today he promised that any changes in plot or context will be reported on by him next week.


72 posted on 09/07/2006 2:18:38 PM PDT by rightazrain (“Ceasefire” is just another word for “reload.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: engrpat
They have gone way over the edge on this one. Of course Bush did this, set it up, told ABC when to run it, etc.

Then I suppose Bush can tell them NOT to edit it, too.

73 posted on 09/07/2006 2:18:40 PM PDT by whatisthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum
ABC issued a statement saying the production, "The Path to 9/11," was still being edited and that criticism of the film's specifics were thus "premature and irresponsible."

IOW, the RATS have something to hide. Something they KNOW would hurt them in 06 and 08. It would also hurt Hillary's chance at the White House in 08. ABC has already signaled that they are going to cut out the parts under protest because of them saying it's "still being edited." A movie that is just days from being shown on TV would already have been edited. They're going to cave in to the pressure. Not that they had much left over, but it will totally destroy any existing credibility they might have.

74 posted on 09/07/2006 2:18:47 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (ISLAM IS A CULT OF DEATH AND NEEDS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

The GOP better get off their butts and make SOMETHING an issue. They will watch the 1994 revolution fade into history otherwise. Censorship is OK but truth is better. Cliton lied and many Americans died because of his failures. He is by far the worst president, even more than Carter, since 1948.


75 posted on 09/07/2006 2:19:02 PM PDT by shankbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: rightazrain

Tens of bloggers were sent promotional DVDs... we need one of them to post changes.


76 posted on 09/07/2006 2:19:32 PM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: lormand
Is anyone betting that ABC will NOT change the series?

Bingo!

They didn't specify what edits were made. There are tons of edits made to a TV presentation prior to air time that have nothing to do with the story line.

Also, everyone will know if they cut out the "good stuff" and if they do cut it, a lot of people will be really pi$$ed at both ABC and the Democrats.

They should be keeping their mouths shut 'cause voters are watching their behavior.

77 posted on 09/07/2006 2:19:59 PM PDT by capt. norm (Dopeler effect: The tendency of stupid ideas to seem smarter when they come at you rapidly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

This sounds right. Plus, the 99 percent of viewers who will not have heard about the controversy will swallow it whole.


78 posted on 09/07/2006 2:20:42 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum
The radical Dems in the media coupled with the sellout Clinton crowd wants ‘Path to 9/11’ pulled since it deals with the pre-9-11 events. The Clinton's despicable motives are geared to continue the Clinton White House' political cover up of guilty, leftist political hacks in charge of US national security, who allowed the jihadist serial killers to commit mass murder on U.S. soil.

The public will view this film, discover the sickening truth concerning a Dem controlled White House, which did nothing to protect the American public from known al-Qaida terrorist threats - and vote accordingly in the November elections.

Harvey Keitel plays counterterrorism expert John O'Neill in ABC's "The Path to 9/11," the network's unflinching five-hour miniseries about the events detailed in the 9/11 Commission Report and other sources. "The Path to 9/11" airs commercial-free at 8 p.m. EDT Sunday and concludes the following evening. 1:24 p.m. ET, 9/6/06

79 posted on 09/07/2006 2:21:32 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum; All
9/11 Timeline: "Intelligence Warnings"

1998: Indonesia Gives US Warning of 9/11 Attack?

Hendropriyono, the Indonesian chief of intelligence, will later claim that, “[we] had intelligence predicting the September 11 attacks three years before it happened but nobody believed us.” He says Indonesian intelligence agents identify bin Laden as the leader of the group plotting the attack and that the US disregards the warning, but otherwise offers no additional details. The Associated Press notes, “Indonesia’s intelligence services are not renowned for their accuracy.” [Associated Press, 7/9/2003]

1999: British Intelligence Warns al-Qaeda Plans to Use Aircraft, Possibly as Flying Bombs

MI6, the British intelligence agency, gives a secret report to liaison staff at the US embassy in London. The reports states that al-Qaeda has plans to use “commercial aircraft” in “unconventional ways,” “possibly as flying bombs.” [Sunday Times (London), 6/9/2002]

March 1999: Germany Provides CIA Hijacker’s Name and Telephone Number

German intelligence gives the CIA the first name of hijacker Marwan Alshehhi and his telephone number in the United Arab Emirates. The Germans learned the information from surveillance of suspected Islamic militants. They tell the CIA that Alshehhi has been in contact with suspected al-Qaeda members Mohammed Haydar Zammar and Mamoun Darkazanli. He is described as a United Arab Emirates student who has spent some time studying in Germany. [US Congress, 7/24/2003; Deutsche Presse-Agentur (Hamburg), 8/13/2003; New York Times, 2/24/2004] The Germans consider this information “particularly valuable” and ask the CIA to track Alshehhi, but the CIA never responds until after the 9/11 attacks. The CIA decides at the time that this “Marwan” is probably an associate of bin Laden but never track him down. It is not clear why the CIA fails to act, or if they learn his last name before 9/11. [New York Times, 2/24/2004] The Germans monitor other calls between Alshehhi and Zammar, but it isn’t clear if the CIA is also told of these or not (see September 21, 1999).

August 12, 2000: Italian Intelligence Wiretap of al-Qaeda Cell Reveals Massive Aircraft-based Strike

Italian intelligence successfully wiretap the al-Qaeda cell in Milan, Italy from late 1999 until the summer of 2001. [Boston Globe, 8/4/2002] In a wiretapped conversation from this day, suspected Yemeni Abdulsalam Ali Abdulrahman tells wanted Egyptian Mahmoud Es Sayed about a massive strike against the enemies of Islam involving aircraft and the sky, a blow that “will be written about in all the newspapers of the world. This will be one of those strikes that will never be forgotten. ... This is a terrifying thing. This is a thing that will spread from south to north, from east to west: The person who came up with this program is a madman from a madhouse, a madman but a genius.” In another conversation, Abdulrahman tells Es Sayed: “I’m studying airplanes. I hope, God willing, that I can bring you a window or a piece of an airplane the next time we see each other.” The comment is followed by laughter. Beginning in October 2000, FBI experts will help Italian police analyze the intercepts and warnings. Neither Italy nor the FBI will understand their meaning until after 9/11. [Boston Globe, 8/4/2002]

Clinton too busy engaging in infidelity with a girl his daughter's age.

"Hey Bubba! 9/11 is YOUR BABY! Weeeee - doooogie!


80 posted on 09/07/2006 2:21:54 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson