Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Outlawing morality, protecting perversion
Enter Stage Right ^ | September 4, 2006 | Charles Bloomer

Posted on 09/07/2006 9:08:22 AM PDT by Gunner9mm

Outlawing morality, protecting perversion

By Charles Bloomer web posted September 4, 2006

In a recent column, I stated that anti-war Liberals are a threat to our society. Their penchant for pacifisms, negotiations, and process, coupled with their refusal to stand up to our enemies could very well lead to the destruction of our way of life. And as others have stated, this may be a passive threat to us in that these people may not want us to lose, but they do not want us to win.

Now comes a story out of California that leads me to state that Social Liberals are an active threat to our society. These Social Liberals are busy undermining our values, our morals, and our beliefs. And they are trying to do it by outlawing any dissent.

According to an article written by Kevin McCullough at Townhall.com, Democrats in the California legislature have passed a law that will make your hair curl. According to McCullough

Democrats in the California State Assembly voted in unison to pass four bills that are all designed to punish people who disagree with them. To incarcerate someone for daring to criticize a different point of view - over a purely behavioral issue.

The four bills in question

would require that in every classroom from kindergarten through high school that perverse sexual activity be praised and highlighted in a positive light. They would require textbooks many of which would then also be produced for other states beyond the borders of California make positive references to the ideas of men putting on women's under things. They would restrict school districts from being able to bar females from displaying dildos on the outerwear of their prom dress. And in functional sexuality courses from K-12 they would require positive explanation of the merits and instruction of anal intercourse.

The Liberal Democrat-controlled legislature has determined that the behavior of roughly two percent of our population, behavior that is considered immoral by a majority, behavior that is, by definition, unnatural should be taught to our schoolchildren starting in kindergarten.

What if you are a teacher in California and you disagree with this attempt to normalize perverse behavior? Suppose you speak negatively about behavior you consider immoral? If these democrats get their way, you will be committing a crime. So, in addition to normalizing immoral, unnatural behavior, the Democrats want to outlaw any dissent – nothing short of violating your Constitutional First Amendment right to free speech.

And these Liberal democrats make it no secret that their goal is to silence dissent and punish those who disagree with their efforts to indoctrinate children in a lifestyle of immorality. As reported by McCullough, Democrat Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez proclaimed, "The real purpose of [these bills] is to outlaw traditional perspectives on marriage and family in the state school system…. The way you correct a wrong (perspective) is by outlawing.'Cause if you don't outlaw it, then people's biases tend to take over and dominate the perspective and the point of view."

Think that Nunez is an anomaly? Not so. California democrats voted for these bills unanimously.

But wait, there's more. In addition to celebrating perversity and criminalizing your Free Speech, the Liberal Democrats in California want to forbid police and fire protection

for any religious institution (i.e. a Bible based church) that would in any way demonstrate negative "doctrine" or "propaganda". So if an arsonist (who also just happened to be a radical activist) decided to burn down a church that was in their view teaching the faithful interpretation of scripture as it relates to sexual practice - then the local fire company could be barred from assisting in the recovery and protection of said facility.

Liberal Social Democrats such as those in California are now the dominant wing of the entire National Democrat Party. These are the people who want a cut-and-run foreign policy while they outlaw "traditional perspectives on marriage and family" and our right to openly voice our dissent. These are the people that want to brainwash your children into "alternative" lifestyles, homosexuality, and immoral behavior starting at the age of five. These are the people who support Ned Lamont, Jack Murtha, Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Boxer. This the party that wants to elect John Kerry or Hillary Clinton to the presidency.

Are those the kinds of people you want to see running this country?

Charles Bloomer is Contributing Editor at Enter Stage Right and creator of Liberty Call US (www.libertycall.us). © 2006 Charles Bloomer


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brainwashing; california; censorship; freedomofspeech; gayrights; mdm

1 posted on 09/07/2006 9:08:26 AM PDT by Gunner9mm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gunner9mm
Democrats in the California State Assembly voted in unison to pass
four bills that are all designed to punish people who disagree with them.
To incarcerate someone for daring to criticize a different point
of view - over a purely behavioral issue.


Nothing less than an attempt at brain-washing on a mass scale.

And time in the gulag if you don't submit.

Stalin would be proud.

Now you really know why the Democrats/"liberals" just can't criticize
Communists. Because they want to do a better job than guys like Stalin.
2 posted on 09/07/2006 9:12:50 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunner9mm

Didn't Arnie terminate at least one of these bills?


3 posted on 09/07/2006 9:32:42 AM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOA
The mantra of the modern left: "Free Speech only applies to modern liberals."

Didn't Howard Dean make some remarks on what he would do to talk radio and Fox News if he was elected? I'm having trouble finding it for reference.
4 posted on 09/07/2006 9:37:15 AM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: M1Tanker

Is this satire? This must have come from the Onion. It is so outrageous.


5 posted on 09/07/2006 9:52:58 AM PDT by bradthebuilder (Iran....we still owe you for the emabassy and the barracks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: M1Tanker
Finally found a few references to Dean stating he would, on "ideological grounds" break up any news organization/group who opposed him.

To the left: This IS Fascism! This is a "police state". This IS the modern Democratic party. Either you take it back or dissolve it. I doubt most leftists even have enough brain cells or common sense left to understand....

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1032411/posts

And here is Dean stating "he supports government regulation of media ownership." These are the same useless morons that call anyone to the right of Rosie O'Donnell a "Fascist". What Dean desires IS fascism. It is also totalitarian socialism (like there is anything but totalitarian socialism). The two philosophies are not far apart. In fact, they are two sides of the same coin. Neither is good for a free nation.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1282206/posts
6 posted on 09/07/2006 9:54:37 AM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gunner9mm
"a bill to punish people who disagree with [social liberals]"
"Social Liberals are an active threat to our society"

Looks like Tweedledee has issues with Tweedledum.
7 posted on 09/07/2006 10:09:56 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bradthebuilder
Unfortunately, it is all too real. It is also not new. This has been going on for years. It is a testament to Western Civilization that it has withstood all comers...thus far. Will it continue to survive a multi-front attack from with and without is the question.

From 2002:
http://www.cultureandfamily.org/articledisplay.asp?id=448&department=CFI&categoryid=cfreport

Nor is it US only (Article from the UK):
http://www.childrens-express.org/dynamic/public/d360218.htm

And more:
http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/news/050413a.aspx

http://www.cwfa.org/articledisplay.asp?id=915&department=CWA&categoryid=education

http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?idCategory=34&idsub=127&id=3365

And last, but not least:
http://www.afajournal.org/2004/october/1004schoolsout.asp

In other idiocy, the Left actually believes their amoral "tolerance" (of everything but those who dare question them) will allow them to "make peace" with the Islamofascists.

From the decades of rantings from said Islamofascists, I think the only thing the left will find if they surrender to their terrorist "allies" is a large knife at their throat, a long rope to hang by, or stonings..... I keep pointing this out to the leftists, but they keep sticking their fingers in their ears and screaming "no..no..no" like the pathetic useless morons they are.

Meanwhile, I'm going to Iraq in a few months to defend them from thier terrorist "allies".
8 posted on 09/07/2006 10:12:34 AM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gunner9mm; bradthebuilder

Sorry, but until I see more evidence, I'm not buying it. Like btb said, this is too outrageous to believe.


9 posted on 09/07/2006 10:14:42 AM PDT by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are intimate bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

Here's an update.
"One 'Sexual Indoctrination' Bill Dead, Two to Go" at www.cnsnews.com

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200609/CUL20060907b.html


10 posted on 09/07/2006 10:41:10 AM PDT by Gunner9mm (www.libertycall.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson