Skip to comments.
Bush Doctrine On Terror Fails To Convince Public
The Guardian (UK) ^
| 9-7-2006
| Ewen MacAskill
Posted on 09/06/2006 7:19:21 PM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Remember two things:
1. I didn't write this article, I just posted it.
2. This is the Guardian (UK), a leftist newspaper. They love to see Bush and failed in the same sentance.
1
posted on
09/06/2006 7:19:23 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
Please let the next terror attack be at the headquarters of The Guardian.
To: blam
This is the Guardian (UK), a leftist newspaper.Calling The Guardian a "leftist newspaper" is like saying that Tiger Woods can occasionally be seen on golf courses.
3
posted on
09/06/2006 7:24:44 PM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
("An empty limousine pulled up and Hillary Clinton got out")
To: blam
How easy it is to be a Leftist these days. Simply scream your opinion as fact and manufacture what EVER you need out of whole cloth. Love the way they are not even within a shouting distance of a hint or a clue of reality in this piece.
Sorry I say any Poll cited by the Guardian is pure Socialist propaganda. What the sample? What are the questions asked. Given a "79% say" numbers pretty obvious they did NOT do anything even remotely looking like a serious poll.
As 10 people a serious polling question and their responses will come out in a bell curve. Some on each end bulk in the middle. When ever you see polling data like this that just happens to fall WAY to one side, and validates every Editorial position of the Junk Media outlet publishing it, you are seeing propaganda, not serious public opinion poll.
4
posted on
09/06/2006 7:25:27 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? or Samurai? or Fascists?)
To: blam
Transatlantic Trends, funded by bodies including the German Marshall Fund of the US, conducted phone interviews with 1,000 people in June in 13 countries: the US, the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria. 1000 in 13 countries? AND no idea what the questions they asked are? Junk Poll.
5
posted on
09/06/2006 7:27:00 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? or Samurai? or Fascists?)
To: blam
Even a CBS poll released today has more Americans feeling safe than unsafe: "Fifty-four percent of Americans say they generally feel safe, but 46 percent say they feel somewhat uneasy or in danger."
Of course if you follow the link, you will see how CBS spins it into horrible news for Bush.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/06/opinion/polls/main1975940.shtml
Who wouldn't be more concerned about terrorism now than 5 years ago? It has been in the news every day for the last 5 years. I'd rather be concerned about terrorism and having an Administration working to prevent it than being oblivious to terrorism and have an Administration doing nothing to prevent it.
6
posted on
09/06/2006 7:30:02 PM PDT
by
frankjr
To: blam
Do the dems even have a doctrine?
To: blam
This may be good news in that a poll reports on less
FELLING of security - in contradiction to "W" saying we
are safer. Two different subjects, conjoined by the
drive-by press. It should increase the votes for Conservatives.
8
posted on
09/06/2006 7:31:53 PM PDT
by
seenenuf
(Progressives are a threat to my children!)
To: blam
. . . a poll yesterday showing a significant jump in the number of Americans and Europeans concerned about Islamist extremism and other global threats. I believe this is good news. Maybe the mushy middle is waking up from their stupor after watching the Hezbo's and the break up of the UK airline bombers. A worried public will be less likely to vote for the foolish appeasers on the left
9
posted on
09/06/2006 7:31:54 PM PDT
by
Maynerd
(New Middle East policy - less troops more nukes)
To: blam
I am truly worried about the UK. Brit Hume had a segment on tonight where members of both the Labor and Conservative Parties stated that the new Prime Minister would have to find a way to show Britain's independence from America, but doing it a way that America can "live with". England may very well be on the verge of siege.
Without our strong binding ties, England will face hostility from the EU and every other Nation (with the exception of Israel, and the USA), with the muzzie nations increasing their aid to the domestic march towards an islamic England.
LLS
10
posted on
09/06/2006 7:34:31 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: seenenuf
Dude you beat me by a second with your superb cogent analysis.
11
posted on
09/06/2006 7:36:49 PM PDT
by
Maynerd
(New Middle East policy - less troops more nukes)
To: blam
Yes, I heard that the Europeans were unhappy with the WOT, especially, Iraq. Of course they are unhappy, if we weren't fighting the terrorists in the Middle East, the terrorists would be concentrating their attacks on us at home. The Euro appeasers think that things were much calmer when the terrorists were concentrating on hitting the US.
The WOT is a multi-front war being fought against Iranian inspired and funded terrorism. We can't sit back and let them bring that war to our shores, ever again. So if the Euro weenies don't like it, too bad.
12
posted on
09/06/2006 7:43:06 PM PDT
by
Eva
To: Eva
Nothing like a foreign reporter talking about what is going on here and the public's reaction to a speech Bush just gave today. How would anyone know what the public thought of the speech? We will not know for a few days. Typical liberal crap. Liberals really do have a superior complex and think we sheep are all stupid.
13
posted on
09/06/2006 7:50:33 PM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: blam
Well, the MSM's support for the WOT lasted all of about 2 weeks. By late Fall of '01 they were the 5th column. No wonder the public have turned on Bush. MSM = traitors, scum, vermin.
14
posted on
09/06/2006 7:56:34 PM PDT
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: Maynerd
"I believe this is good news. Maybe the mushy middle is waking up from their stupor after watching the Hezbo's and the break up of the UK airline bombers. A worried public will be less likely to vote for the foolish appeasers on the left. I don't even know anyone who does not support GWB's WOT and most say he ought to be tougher and deadlier.
15
posted on
09/06/2006 8:01:03 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
I'm so sick and tired of hearing the dems say we aren't safer, or safe, but we haven't had an attack against us for five years. What part of NO ATTACK don't they understand??????
16
posted on
09/06/2006 8:06:00 PM PDT
by
sissyjane
(Don't be stuck on stupid!)
To: Eva
Let;s ignore the obvious truth that Iraq got out of hand largely because Europe failed to pitch in, as Bush expected they would, after Saddam feel. France and Germany prevented any unity of action and encouraged the insurgency.
17
posted on
09/06/2006 8:06:43 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: blam
I don't think the poll supports their conclusion.
The fact that people are more concerned or worried is part of why we are safer.
It encourages people to be vigilant. It encourages our public servants to continue their successful prevention efforts. It encourages enlistments to the armed forces.
The idea that psychic comfort is the measure of safety is absurd.
To: blam
"concern among Americans has risen from 72% last year to 79% this year""Concern is expressed...not only about global terrorism and Islamist fundamentalism but...the Iraq conflict and confrontation with Iran."
What those dolts at
The Guardian are too dumb to grasp is that this is great news for the Republicans! The American people are not about to entrust national security to that bunch of sociopaths and morons known as the Democrat Party--not in these dangerous times!
And note tagline!
19
posted on
09/06/2006 8:15:33 PM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President George Bush.)
To: blam
" GWB's WOT and most say he ought to be tougher and deadlier. "
I agree.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson