Nope.
Not in the slightest.
By Iraqis I assume you meant the legitimately elected government, not the rebels.
Clarity.
Not if those journalists were involved in covering up terrorist activities.
For example, Lets say as a journalist I went to visit Jeffrey Dahmer before he was arrested by the authorities. Say we had a nice little chat about his murders and he shows me evidence of them. We also talk about his future plans to kidnap young boys, sexually abuse them, kill them and eat them. I also ask some nice questions (like the one's dictators get from the lib media) about his favorite music, colors, clothes, how much he hates Bush etc. Then I publish my scoop and keep my sources anonymous. Then, lets say Dhamer kills a few more people and eats them. Further complicating the issue, of course, is that in order to make Bush and the incumbent party look bad I am hoping Dhamer kills and eats more people.
So then as a journalist should I get to claim "journalistic integrity" and not reveal my sources? Does my knowledge of past and future crimes matter?
IMO journalists should be charged as accessory to murder for not notifying the authorities of terrorists (or Dhamer's) wherabouts or intentions?
Journalists are accountable for crimes they cover up when interviewing "terrorists" who plan to blow up men, women and children.
If Western journalists are giving away info they shouldn't then I have no problem with the Iraqi government treating them as an enemy of the state.
No. Their state, their enemies. They can do what they will.
"If the Iraqis apprehend any of the Western journalists who are meeting with terrorists, would anyone have a problem if the Iraqi government sentenced them to death as enemies of the state?"
None whatsoever
Only if they waste time and money on a trial...
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F